| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Users with low privileges can perform certain AJAX actions. In this vulnerability instance, improper access to ajax?action=plugin:focus:checkIframeAvailability leads to a Server-Side Request Forgery by analyzing the error messages returned from the back-end. Allowing an attacker to perform a port scan in the back-end. At the time of publication of the CVE no patch is available.
|
| Multiple Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerabilities were identified in the significant-gravitas/autogpt repository, specifically in the GitHub Integration and Web Search blocks. These vulnerabilities affect version agpt-platform-beta-v0.1.1. The issues arise when block inputs are controlled by untrusted sources, leading to potential credential leakage, internal network scanning, and unauthorized access to internal services, APIs, or data stores. The affected blocks include GithubListPullRequestsBlock, GithubReadPullRequestBlock, GithubAssignPRReviewerBlock, GithubListPRReviewersBlock, GithubUnassignPRReviewerBlock, GithubCommentBlock, GithubMakeIssueBlock, GithubReadIssueBlock, GithubListIssuesBlock, GithubAddLabelBlock, GithubRemoveLabelBlock, GithubListBranchesBlock, and ExtractWebsiteContentBlock. |
| Icinga Reporting is the central component for reporting related functionality in the monitoring web frontend and framework Icinga Web 2. A vulnerability present in versions 0.10.0 through 1.0.2 allows to set up a template that allows to embed arbitrary Javascript. This enables the attacker to act on behalf of the user, if the template is being previewed; and act on behalf of the headless browser, if a report using the template is printed to PDF. This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.3 of Icinga Reporting. As a workaround, review all templates and remove suspicious settings. |
| The Ninja Forms Webhooks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.7 via the form webhook functionality. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| hopetree izone lts c011b48 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the active push function as \\apps\\tool\\apis\\bd_push.py does not securely filter user input through push_urls() and get_urls(). |
| Gomatrixserverlib is a Go library for matrix federation. Gomatrixserverlib is vulnerable to server-side request forgery, serving content from a private network it can access, under certain conditions. The commit `c4f1e01` fixes this issue. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should use a local firewall to limit the network segments and hosts the service using gomatrixserverlib can access. |
| The Proofpoint Encryption endpoint of Proofpoint Enterprise Protection contains a Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability that allows an authenticated user to relay HTTP requests from the Protection server to otherwise private network addresses. |
| A flaw was found in OpenShift Console. A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) attack can happen if an attacker supplies all or part of a URL to the server to query. The server is considered to be in a privileged network position and can often reach exposed services that aren't readily available to clients due to network filtering. Leveraging such an attack vector, the attacker can have an impact on other services and potentially disclose information or have other nefarious effects on the system.
The /api/dev-console/proxy/internet endpoint on the OpenShift Console allows authenticated users to have the console's pod perform arbitrary and fully controlled HTTP(s) requests. The full response to these requests is returned by the endpoint.
While the name of this endpoint suggests the requests are only bound to the internet, no such checks are in place. An authenticated user can therefore ask the console to perform arbitrary HTTP requests from outside the cluster to a service inside the cluster. |
| Cost Calculator Builder Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to 3.1.72, via the send_demo_webhook() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the Remote Browser Plugin in Sonatype Nexus Repository 2.x up to and including 2.15.2 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to exfiltrate proxy repository credentials via crafted HTTP requests. |
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists n multiple versions of Nimesa Backup and Recovery, If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended requests may be sent to internal servers. |
| Plane, an open-source project management tool, has a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in versions prior to 0.17-dev. This issue may allow an attacker to send arbitrary requests from the server hosting the application, potentially leading to unauthorized access to internal systems. The impact of this vulnerability includes, but is not limited to, unauthorized access to internal services accessible from the server, potential leakage of sensitive information from internal services, manipulation of internal systems by interacting with internal APIs. Version 0.17-dev contains a patch for this issue. Those who are unable to update immediately may mitigate the issue by restricting outgoing network connections from servers hosting the application to essential services only and/or implementing strict input validation on URLs or parameters that are used to generate server-side requests. |
| BigFix Patch Download Plug-ins are affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. It may allow the application to download files from an internally hosted server on localhost. |
| An issue was discovered in Teledyne FLIR M300 2.00-19. Unauthenticated remote code execution can occur in the web server. An attacker can exploit this by sending a POST request to the vulnerable PHP page. An attacker can elevate to root permissions with Sudo. |
| Smartliving SmartLAN/G/SI <=6.x contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability in the GetImage functionality through the 'host' parameter. Attackers can exploit the onvif.cgi endpoint by specifying external domains to bypass firewalls and perform network enumeration through arbitrary HTTP requests. |
| hackmd-mcp is a Model Context Protocol server for integrating HackMD's note-taking platform with AI assistants. From 1.4.0 to before 1.5.0, hackmd-mcp contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability when the server is run in HTTP transport mode. Arbitrary hackmdApiUrl values supplied via the Hackmd-Api-Url HTTP header or a base64-encoded JSON query parameter are accepted without validation, allowing attackers to redirect outbound API requests to internal network services, access internal endpoints, perform network reconnaissance, and bypass network access controls. The stdio transport mode is not affected because it only accepts stdio requests. The issue is fixed in version 1.5.0, which enforces allowed endpoints and supports the ALLOWED_HACKMD_API_URLS environment variable. Users should update to 1.5.0 or later or apply documented mitigations such as switching to stdio mode, restricting outbound network access, or filtering the Hackmd-Api-Url header and related query parameter via a reverse proxy. |
| Applications that use UriComponentsBuilder to parse an externally provided URL (e.g. through a query parameter) AND perform validation checks on the host of the parsed URL may be vulnerable to a open redirect https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/601.html attack or to a SSRF attack if the URL is used after passing validation checks.
This is the same as CVE-2024-22259 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22259 and CVE-2024-22243 https://spring.io/security/cve-2024-22243 , but with different input. |
| New API is a large language mode (LLM) gateway and artificial intelligence (AI) asset management system. An authenticated Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in versions prior to 0.9.0.5. A feature within the application allows authenticated users to submit a URL for the server to process its content. The application fails to properly validate this user-supplied URL before making a server-side request. This vulnerability is not limited to image URLs and can be triggered with any link provided to the vulnerable endpoint. Since user registration is often enabled by default, any registered user can exploit this. By crafting a malicious URL, an attacker can coerce the server to send requests to arbitrary internal or external services. The vulnerability has been patched in version 0.9.0.5. The patch introduces a comprehensive, user-configurable SSRF protection module, which is enabled by default to protect server security. This new feature provides administrators with granular control over outbound requests made by the server. For users who cannot upgrade immediately, some temporary mitigation options are available. Enable new-api image processing worker (new-api-worker) and/or configure egress firewall rules. |
| The ip (aka node-ip) package through 2.0.1 (in NPM) might allow SSRF because the IP address value 0 is improperly categorized as globally routable via isPublic. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-29415. NOTE: in current versions of several applications, connection attempts to the IP address 0 (interpreted as 0.0.0.0) are blocked with error messages such as net::ERR_ADDRESS_INVALID. However, in some situations that depend on both application version and operating system, connection attempts to 0 and 0.0.0.0 are considered connection attempts to 127.0.0.1 (and, for this reason, a false value of isPublic would be preferable). |
| A vulnerability was found in WISI Tangram GT31 up to 20241214 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
