| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in AI Engine <= 3.7.8 versions. |
| Joomla Extension - joomshaper.com - Unauthenticated PII Exposure via IDOR in Guest Checkout in Easy Store extension 1.0.0-3.0.0 - The checkout.searchGuestUser endpoint allowed querying guest checkout records solely by supplying an email address. The server returned complete shipping details (full name, phone number, street address, city, postal code, and country) directly from the #__easystore_guests table with no authentication, session validation, or ownership checks. An unauthenticated attacker could iterate through email lists to enumerate guest customers and harvest sensitive Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Resolved by removing the unauthenticated server-side guest lookup endpoint entirely and migrating autofill functionality to client-side localStorage protected by explicit user consent. |
| Contributor Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in SiteSkite <= 2.1.7 versions. |
| Unleash is an open-source feature management platform. Prior to 8.0.3, cloneFeatureToggle and POST /api/admin/projects/:projectId/features/:featureName/clone authorize creation in the destination project but do not verify access to the source project. Because feature names are globally unique, a user with create or clone permission in one project who knows or guesses another project's feature name can copy that feature into the authorized project and inspect its strategy parameters, constraints, variants, and variant payloads. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.3. |
| Formie is a Craft CMS plugin for creating forms. Prior to 2.2.23 and 3.1.31, Formie's formie/sent-notifications/get-resend-modal-content control panel action in SentNotificationsController::actionGetResendModalContent accepts a request-supplied notification ID without permission or object-level authorization checks. Any authenticated user able to invoke the action can enumerate notification IDs and read recipient headers and complete HTML email bodies containing submitted form data, even without the sent-notification viewing permission. This issue is fixed in versions 2.2.23 and 3.1.31. |
| InvoiceShelf is an open-source web & mobile app that helps track expenses, payments and create professional invoices and estimates. Prior to version 2.4.1, in InvoiceShelf's multi-company installations, any user who is an Owner of one company can read and overwrite any user account in any other company on the same installation. `GET/PUT /api/v1/users/{user}` resolves the target `User` by global primary key, and `UserPolicy` checks only that the requester owns their own header-company — it never verifies that the target user belongs to that company. This allows cross-tenant disclosure of user data and full account takeover (email/password overwrite + company re-assignment). Version 2.4.1 fixes the issue. |
| The Tutor LMS – eLearning and online course solution plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to, and including, 4.0.7 via the tutor_quiz_builder_save AJAX action due to missing validation that nested question_id, answer_id, deleted_question_ids[], and deleted_answer_ids[] values in the submitted payload belong to a quiz/topic/course the requester is authorized to manage. The handler only validates the top-level course_id, topic_id, and (when supplied) payload['ID'], but the nested identifiers are passed straight into $wpdb->update/DELETE statements in QuizBuilder::save_questions(), QuizBuilder::save_question_answers(), and QuizBuilder::handle_delete(). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Instructor-level access and above, to overwrite the content and re-parent arbitrary quiz questions/answers belonging to other instructors or administrators, and to delete arbitrary quiz question and answer rows. |
| Photoview through 2.4.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the shareAlbum GraphQL mutation that allows authenticated users to create share links for albums owned by other users. Attackers can supply arbitrary album IDs to generate working share tokens for victim albums, exposing photos and sub-albums to anyone with the link while retaining indefinite control over token settings. |
| lamp-cloud through 5.10.0 fails to validate the employeeId parameter in the /anyone/visible/resource endpoint, allowing authenticated users to read any employee's roles and permissions. Attackers can supply arbitrary employeeId values to enumerate other employees' role codes, permission codes, and complete front-end router trees without authorization checks. |
| WEBCON BPS is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) in the /api/vacations/{path} endpoint. The selectedPeople parameter in the Gantt vacation chart API does not validate whether the requesting user is authorized to access the requested users' data. An authenticated attacker can supply arbitrary user logins in the selectedPeople parameter to view vacation schedules of other employees, including managers and staff from other offices, regardless of business logic access restrictions, resulting in unauthorized disclosure of sensitive scheduling information.This vulnerability was fixed in versions: 2025.2.1.177 and 2026.1.1.20 |
| ZohoCorp ManageEngine Applications Manager versions 182000 and below allowed a low-privileged user to obtain an administrator’s API key and use it to perform administrator-level actions. |
| ZohoCorp ManageEngine OpManager and Firewall Analyzer versions 12.8.710 and below were vulnerable to a Broken Access Control vulnerability that allowed an authenticated low-privilege user to modify Change Management report schedule configurations for firewalls outside their assigned scope. |
| Unleash is an open-source feature management platform. Prior to 8.0.3, the Unleash admin API contains five authorization vulnerabilities. POST /api/admin/segments/strategies assigns the Promise returned by hasPermission without awaiting it, allowing authenticated users to modify segment assignments without UPDATE_FEATURE_STRATEGY permission for the target project and environment. GET /api/admin/projects/:projectId/features/:featureName/environments/:environment/variants does not bind the requested feature to projectId, allowing cross-project variant configuration disclosure. GET .../strategies/:strategyId uses strategyId without validating the project and feature context, allowing cross-project strategy configuration disclosure. getEnvironmentInfo does not validate that the requested feature belongs to the supplied project, allowing cross-project environment information disclosure. PUT /:projectId/tags accepts feature identifiers without verifying that they belong to the URL project, allowing cross-project tag modification. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.3. |
| An authorization bypass vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed any authenticated user of the instance to read the raw diff or patch of pull requests in private repositories without authorization. Access tokens for raw pull request diffs and patches were scoped to the repository name and pull request number rather than to a globally unique repository identifier, so an attacker who created a repository and pull request matching a target's repository name and pull request number could use a token for their own repository to retrieve the private pull request's contents. Exploitation required the attacker to know the target repository's name and a valid pull request number. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.22 and was fixed in versions 3.17.21, 3.18.15, 3.19.12, 3.20.8, and 3.21.6. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. |
| A flaw was found in open-cluster-management. An agent communicating via the gRPC broker can bypass authorization by manipulating the `ce-clustername` cloud event header attribute, which is used for authorization, independently of the actual event payload. This allows a registered managed cluster to gain unauthorized access, enabling it to move itself into other tenants' ManagedClusterSets and overwrite other clusters' ManagedCluster objects in the hub. The primary consequence is a breach of isolation between managed clusters, leading to unauthorized modification of cluster resources. This can lead to unauthorized receipt of newly delivered tenant workloads, policies, and secrets via Placement decisions. Additionally, an attacker can arbitrarily overwrite other clusters' ManagedCluster objects on the hub or perform unauthorized writes inside another cluster's dedicated hub namespace, such as forging Lease liveness heartbeats to manipulate availability status. |
| Unleash is an open-source feature management platform. Prior to 8.0.3, POST /api/admin/projects/:projectId/features/:featureName/environments/:environment/strategies/set-sort-order passes attacker-controlled strategy IDs to unprotectedUpdateStrategiesSortOrder and updateSortOrder without verifying that the IDs belong to the project, feature, and environment authorized by the URL. In a multi-project Pro or Enterprise deployment, an authenticated user with UPDATE_FEATURE_STRATEGY in one project who knows another project's strategy IDs can reorder those strategies, changing feature evaluation precedence while the operation is attributed to the attacker's URL context rather than the affected project. The single-project OSS edition lacks the cross-project dimension, although the missing context binding still permits unauthorized reordering across features or environments in the default project. The endpoint changes only sort_order and does not modify strategy parameters, constraints, or segments. This issue is fixed in version 8.0.3. |
| ZohoCorp ManageEngine OpManager and Firewall Analyzer versions 12.8.710 and below were vulnerable to a Broken Access Control vulnerability that allowed an authenticated low-privilege user to create alert notifications for firewalls outside their assigned scope. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. A project has a signature validation credential foreign key used to
validate signed project content. Unlike the project's SCM credential, the
authorization logic does not verify that the requesting user has use permission
on the referenced credential, and the API field has no validator or type
restriction. An authenticated user holding only the organization project
administrator role can therefore bind an arbitrary credential belonging to
another organization, by its identifier, when creating or updating a project.
The controller discloses that credential's name and type in the project's
summary information and, during project synchronization, decrypts the bound
credential and uses it in the attacker-controlled project's update, allowing a
cross-tenant authorization boundary violation and information disclosure. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller.
The host_filter query parameter on the hosts list API is parsed into a raw Django
ORM filter whose lookup path is validated only against a sensitive-field blocklist,
with no authorization check on the database relations it traverses. Because job
event and ad-hoc command output fields are not on that blocklist, an authenticated
user holding only the Read role on an inventory can construct filters that traverse
into the output of jobs they have no permission to view and use the returned host
count as a boolean oracle. Using regular-expression lookups, the attacker can
extract, character by character, the output (which routinely contains plaintext
credentials, tokens, and command results) of jobs and ad-hoc commands belonging to
other organizations, resulting in cross-tenant disclosure of job output |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller.
When creating or editing an execution environment, the controller does not verify
that the requesting user has use permission on the container registry credential
referenced by the execution environment; it validates only the organization and
the credential kind. An authenticated user who is an execution-environment admin
of one organization can associate a container registry credential belonging to a
different organization -- one they cannot otherwise read, list, or use -- to an
execution environment they control. When a job runs with that execution
environment, the controller decrypts the foreign credential's registry password
and supplies it to the container runtime, disclosing another organization's
registry credentials across the tenant boundary. |
