| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Integer overflow or wraparound in .NET allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Access allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Out-of-bounds read in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda W20E 15.11.0.6(1068_1546_841)_CN_TDC. Impacted is the function formQOSRuleDel of the file /goform/delQos of the component QoS Rule Deletion. Performing a manipulation of the argument qosIndex results in stack-based buffer overflow. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Installer allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Use of inherently dangerous function PQfn(..., result_is_int=0, ...) in PostgreSQL libpq lo_export(), lo_read(), lo_lseek64(), and lo_tell64() functions allows the server superuser to overwrite a client stack buffer with an arbitrarily-large response. Like gets(), PQfn(..., result_is_int=0, ...) stores arbitrary-length, server-determined data into a buffer of unspecified size. Because both the \lo_export command in psql and pg_dump call lo_read(), the server superuser can overwrite pg_dump or psql stack memory. Versions before PostgreSQL 18.4, 17.10, 16.14, 15.18, and 14.23 are affected. |
| An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.2. POST /v3/credentials did not validate that the caller-supplied project_id for an EC2-type credential matched the project of the authenticating application credential. This allowed an attacker holding an unrestricted application credential for project A to create an EC2 credential targeting project B; a subsequent /v3/ec2tokens exchange would then issue a Keystone token scoped to project B while still carrying the original app_cred_id, enabling cross-project lateral movement within the credential owner's role footprint. |
| The ToASCII and ToUnicode functions incorrectly accept Punycode-encoded labels that decode to an ASCII-only label. For example, ToUnicode("xn--example-.com") incorrectly returns the name "example.com" rather than an error. This behavior can lead to privilege escalation in programs using the idna package. For example, a program which performs privilege checks on the ASCII hostname may reject "example.com" but permit "xn--example-.com". If that program subsequently converts the ASCII hostname to Unicode, it will inadvertently permits access to the Unicode name "example.com". |
| When verifying a certificate chain containing excluded DNS constraints, these constraints are not correctly applied to wildcard DNS SANs which use a different case than the constraint. This only affects validation of otherwise trusted certificate chains, issued by a root CA in the VerifyOptions.Roots CertPool, or in the system certificate pool. |
| url.Parse insufficiently validated the host/authority component and accepted some invalid URLs. |
