| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Windows Power Management Service Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| Windows Internet Key Exchange (IKE) Extension Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Named Pipe File System Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Windows Client Server Run-time Subsystem (CSRSS) Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Layer 2 Tunneling Protocol Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Adobe Flash Player versions 23.0.0.205 and earlier, 11.2.202.643 and earlier have an exploitable type confusion vulnerability. Successful exploitation could lead to arbitrary code execution. |
| The UNC implementation in Microsoft Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, and Windows RT Gold and 8.1 does not include authentication from the server to the client, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by making crafted data available on a UNC share, as demonstrated by Group Policy data from a spoofed domain controller, aka "Group Policy Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." |
| The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, and Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted packets, aka "Windows SMB Authenticated Remote Code Execution Vulnerability." |
| The Security Account Manager Remote (SAMR) protocol implementation in Microsoft Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Windows Vista SP2, Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, and Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2 does not properly determine the user-lockout state, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass the account lockout policy and obtain access via a brute-force attack, aka "SAMR Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability." |
| The process-initialization implementation in win32k.sys in the kernel-mode drivers in Microsoft Windows 8, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT Gold and 8.1, and Windows 10 does not properly constrain impersonation levels, which allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." |