| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
|
Observable Response Discrepancy in SICK FTMg AIR FLOW SENSOR with Partnumbers 1100214, 1100215, 1100216, 1120114, 1120116, 1122524, 1122526 allows a remote attacker
to gain information about valid usernames by analyzing challenge responses from the server via the
REST interface.
|
| An improper input validation in the Qualcom plctool allows a local attacker with low privileges to gain root access by changing the ownership of specific files. |
| An unauthenticated local attacker can perform a privilege escalation due to improper input validation in the OCPP agent service. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can perform a log injection due to improper input validation. Only a certain log file is affected.
|
|
Dell Networking Switches running Enterprise SONiC versions 4.1.0, 4.0.5, 3.5.4 and below contains an improper input validation vulnerability. A remote unauthenticated malicious user may exploit this vulnerability and escalate privileges up to the highest administrative level. This is a Critical vulnerability affecting certain protocols, Dell recommends customers to upgrade at the earliest opportunity.
|
| Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data vulnerability in NotFound WM Options Import Export allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects WM Options Import Export: from n/a through 1.0.1. |
| An Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Juniper Tunnel Driver (jtd) and ICMP module of Juniper Networks Junos OS Evolved allows an unauthenticated attacker within the MPLS administrative domain to send specifically crafted packets to the Routing Engine (RE) to cause a Denial of Service (DoS).
When specifically crafted transit MPLS IPv4 packets are received by the Packet Forwarding Engine (PFE), these packets are internally forwarded to the RE. Continued receipt of these packets may create a sustained Denial of Service (DoS) condition.
This issue affects Juniper Networks Junos OS:
* All versions before 21.2R3-S8-EVO;
* from 21.4-EVO before 21.4R3-S6-EVO;
* from 22.2-EVO before 22.2R3-S4-EVO;
* from 22.3-EVO before 22.3R3-S3-EVO;
* from 22.4-EVO before 22.4R3-EVO;
* from 23.2-EVO before 23.2R2-EVO.
* from 23.4-EVO before 23.4R1-S1-EVO. |
| Windows Win32k Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Windows Kernel Memory Information Disclosure Vulnerability |
| Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Visual Studio Code Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Raw Image Extension Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Windows Error Reporting Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability |
| Microsoft ODBC and OLE DB Remote Code Execution Vulnerability |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in HasThemes HT Mega.This issue affects HT Mega: from n/a through 2.4.7.
|
| The GLPI Agent is a generic management agent. A vulnerability that only affects GLPI-Agent installed on windows via MSI packaging can allow a local user to cause denial of agent service by replacing GLPI server url with a wrong url or disabling the service. Additionally, in the case the Deploy task is installed, a local malicious user can trigger privilege escalation configuring a malicious server providing its own deploy task payload. GLPI-Agent 1.7.2 contains a patch for this issue. As a workaround, edit GLPI-Agent related key under `HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall` and add `SystemComponent` DWORD value setting it to `1` to hide GLPI-Agent from installed applications. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the Web Services feature of newer
Lexmark devices. |
| Under certain conditions, the memory of SAP GUI
for Windows contains the password used to log on to an SAP system, which might
allow an attacker to get hold of the password and impersonate the affected
user. As a result, it has a high impact on the confidentiality but there is no
impact on the integrity and availability. |
| Sensitive information disclosure due to insecure registry permissions. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 30025, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 30984. |
| Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. **To exploit this** the pipeline author must be supplying the secrets to a plugin that is designed in such a way that will print those parameters in logs. Plugin parameters are not designed for sensitive values and are often intentionally printed throughout execution for informational/debugging purposes. Parameters should therefore be treated as insensitive. While Vela provides secrets masking, secrets exposure is not entirely solved by the masking process. A docker image (plugin) can easily expose secrets if they are not handled properly, or altered in some way. There is a responsibility on the end-user to understand how values injected into a plugin are used. This is a risk that exists for many CICD systems (like GitHub Actions) that handle sensitive runtime variables. Rather, the greater risk is that users who restrict a secret to the "no commands" option and use image restriction can still have their secret value exposed via substitution tinkering, which turns the image and command restrictions into a false sense of security. This issue has been addressed in version 0.23.2. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should not provide sensitive values to plugins that can potentially expose them, especially in `parameters` that are not intended to be used for sensitive values, ensure plugins (especially those that utilize shared secrets) follow best practices to avoid logging parameters that are expected to be sensitive, minimize secrets with `pull_request` events enabled, as this allows users to change pipeline configurations and pull in secrets to steps not typically part of the CI process, make use of the build approval setting, restricting builds from untrusted users, and limit use of shared secrets, as they are less restrictive to access by nature. |
