Filtered by CWE-200
Total 9776 CVE
CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2025-43367 1 Apple 3 Macos, Macos Sonoma, Macos Tahoe 2025-11-04 5.5 Medium
A privacy issue was addressed by moving sensitive data. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.8. An app may be able to access protected user data.
CVE-2025-43362 1 Apple 4 Ios, Ipad Os, Ipados and 1 more 2025-11-04 9.8 Critical
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in iOS 26 and iPadOS 26, iOS 18.7 and iPadOS 18.7. An app may be able to monitor keystrokes without user permission.
CVE-2024-8929 3 Php, Php Group, Redhat 3 Php, Php, Enterprise Linux 2025-11-03 5.8 Medium
In PHP versions 8.1.* before 8.1.31, 8.2.* before 8.2.26, 8.3.* before 8.3.14, a hostile MySQL server can cause the client to disclose the content of its heap containing data from other SQL requests and possible other data belonging to different users of the same server.
CVE-2024-5535 2 Openssl, Redhat 7 Openssl, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services and 4 more 2025-11-03 9.1 Critical
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto with an empty supported client protocols buffer may cause a crash or memory contents to be sent to the peer. Impact summary: A buffer overread can have a range of potential consequences such as unexpected application beahviour or a crash. In particular this issue could result in up to 255 bytes of arbitrary private data from memory being sent to the peer leading to a loss of confidentiality. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_select_next_proto function with a 0 length list of supported client protocols are affected by this issue. This would normally never be a valid scenario and is typically not under attacker control but may occur by accident in the case of a configuration or programming error in the calling application. The OpenSSL API function SSL_select_next_proto is typically used by TLS applications that support ALPN (Application Layer Protocol Negotiation) or NPN (Next Protocol Negotiation). NPN is older, was never standardised and is deprecated in favour of ALPN. We believe that ALPN is significantly more widely deployed than NPN. The SSL_select_next_proto function accepts a list of protocols from the server and a list of protocols from the client and returns the first protocol that appears in the server list that also appears in the client list. In the case of no overlap between the two lists it returns the first item in the client list. In either case it will signal whether an overlap between the two lists was found. In the case where SSL_select_next_proto is called with a zero length client list it fails to notice this condition and returns the memory immediately following the client list pointer (and reports that there was no overlap in the lists). This function is typically called from a server side application callback for ALPN or a client side application callback for NPN. In the case of ALPN the list of protocols supplied by the client is guaranteed by libssl to never be zero in length. The list of server protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. In this case if the SSL_select_next_proto function has been called as expected (with the list supplied by the client passed in the client/client_len parameters), then the application will not be vulnerable to this issue. If the application has accidentally been configured with a zero length server list, and has accidentally passed that zero length server list in the client/client_len parameters, and has additionally failed to correctly handle a "no overlap" response (which would normally result in a handshake failure in ALPN) then it will be vulnerable to this problem. In the case of NPN, the protocol permits the client to opportunistically select a protocol when there is no overlap. OpenSSL returns the first client protocol in the no overlap case in support of this. The list of client protocols comes from the application and should never normally be expected to be of zero length. However if the SSL_select_next_proto function is accidentally called with a client_len of 0 then an invalid memory pointer will be returned instead. If the application uses this output as the opportunistic protocol then the loss of confidentiality will occur. This issue has been assessed as Low severity because applications are most likely to be vulnerable if they are using NPN instead of ALPN - but NPN is not widely used. It also requires an application configuration or programming error. Finally, this issue would not typically be under attacker control making active exploitation unlikely. The FIPS modules in 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing new releases of OpenSSL at this time. The fix will be included in the next releases when they become available.
CVE-2024-47671 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: USB: usbtmc: prevent kernel-usb-infoleak The syzbot reported a kernel-usb-infoleak in usbtmc_write, we need to clear the structure before filling fields.
CVE-2024-46854 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-11-03 7.1 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: dpaa: Pad packets to ETH_ZLEN When sending packets under 60 bytes, up to three bytes of the buffer following the data may be leaked. Avoid this by extending all packets to ETH_ZLEN, ensuring nothing is leaked in the padding. This bug can be reproduced by running $ ping -s 11 destination
CVE-2024-46794 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-11-03 3.3 Low
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/tdx: Fix data leak in mmio_read() The mmio_read() function makes a TDVMCALL to retrieve MMIO data for an address from the VMM. Sean noticed that mmio_read() unintentionally exposes the value of an initialized variable (val) on the stack to the VMM. This variable is only needed as an output value. It did not need to be passed to the VMM in the first place. Do not send the original value of *val to the VMM. [ dhansen: clarify what 'val' is used for. ]
CVE-2024-45624 1 Pgpool 1 Pgpool-ii 2025-11-03 7.5 High
Exposure of sensitive information due to incompatible policies issue exists in Pgpool-II. If a database user accesses a query cache, table data unauthorized for the user may be retrieved.
CVE-2025-31191 1 Apple 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
This issue was addressed through improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, tvOS 18.4, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
CVE-2025-31183 1 Apple 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more 2025-11-03 9.8 Critical
The issue was addressed with improved restriction of data container access. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.7.5, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, tvOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
CVE-2025-30463 1 Apple 3 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
The issue was addressed with improved restriction of data container access. This issue is fixed in iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
CVE-2025-30455 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. A malicious app may be able to access private information.
CVE-2025-30454 1 Apple 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
A path handling issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Sonoma 14.7.5, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, tvOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. A malicious app may be able to access private information.
CVE-2025-30447 1 Apple 5 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 2 more 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
The issue was resolved by sanitizing logging This issue is fixed in visionOS 2.4, macOS Ventura 13.7.5, tvOS 18.4, iPadOS 17.7.6, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
CVE-2025-30443 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
A privacy issue was addressed by removing the vulnerable code. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data.
CVE-2025-30439 1 Apple 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more 2025-11-03 4.6 Medium
The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in visionOS 2.4, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An attacker with physical access to a locked device may be able to view sensitive user information.
CVE-2025-30426 1 Apple 5 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 2 more 2025-11-03 9.8 Critical
This issue was addressed with additional entitlement checks. This issue is fixed in visionOS 2.4, tvOS 18.4, iPadOS 17.7.6, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to enumerate a user's installed apps.
CVE-2025-30424 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-03 9.8 Critical
A logging issue was addressed with improved data redaction. This issue is fixed in macOS Ventura 13.7.5, macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. Deleting a conversation in Messages may expose user contact information in system logging.
CVE-2025-24283 1 Apple 4 Ipados, Iphone Os, Macos and 1 more 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
A logging issue was addressed with improved data redaction. This issue is fixed in visionOS 2.4, iOS 18.4 and iPadOS 18.4, macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to access sensitive user data.
CVE-2025-24280 1 Apple 1 Macos 2025-11-03 5.5 Medium
An access issue was addressed with additional sandbox restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4, macOS Sonoma 14.7.5. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data.