Total
8349 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-3638 | 1 Moodle | 1 Moodle | 2025-06-16 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in Moodle. The analysis request action in the Brickfield tool did not include the necessary token to prevent a Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) risk. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52129 | 1 Mtrv | 1 Teachpress | 2025-06-16 | 6.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Winkler teachPress.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through 9.0.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5132 | 1 Project Team | 1 Tmall Demo | 2025-06-16 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Tmall Demo up to 20250505. It has been rated as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file tmall/admin/account/logout. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5930 | 2025-06-16 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP2HTML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the save() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5926 | 2025-06-16 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Link Shield plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.5.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the link_shield_menu_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50932 | 1 Savignano | 1 S\/notify | 2025-06-13 | 8.3 High |
| An issue was discovered in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence. While an administrative user is logged on, the configuration settings of S/Notify can be modified via a CSRF attack. The injection could be initiated by the administrator clicking a malicious link in an email or by visiting a malicious website. If executed while an administrator is logged on to Confluence, an attacker could exploit this to modify the configuration of the S/Notify app on that host. This can, in particular, lead to email notifications being no longer encrypted when they should be. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31503 | 1 Dolibarr | 1 Dolibarr Erp\/crm | 2025-06-13 | 7.5 High |
| Incorrect access control in Dolibarr ERP CRM versions 19.0.0 and before, allows authenticated attackers to steal victim users' session cookies and CSRF protection tokens via user interaction with a crafted web page, leading to account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52074 | 1 Flycms Project | 1 Flycms | 2025-06-13 | 8.8 High |
| FlyCms v1.0 was discovered to contain a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the component system/site/webconfig_updagte. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4327 | 1 Mrcms | 1 Mrcms | 2025-06-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in MRCMS 3.1.2. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Multiple endpoints might be affected. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8085 | 1 Solidcode | 1 Peoplepond | 2025-06-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The PeoplePond WordPress plugin through 1.1.9 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8082 | 1 Justintadlock | 1 Widgets Reset | 2025-06-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Widgets Reset WordPress plugin through 0.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-8050 | 1 Jfarthing | 1 Custom Author Base | 2025-06-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Custom Author Base WordPress plugin through 1.1.1 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2024-8032 | 1 Ulfbenjaminsson | 1 Smooth Gallery Replacement | 2025-06-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Smooth Gallery Replacement WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4363 | 1 Cedcommerce | 2 Wholesale Market, Wholesale Market For Woocommerce | 2025-06-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Wholesale Market WordPress plugin before 2.2.2, Wholesale Market for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 2.0.1 have a flawed CSRF check when updating their settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin update them via a CSRF attack | ||||
| CVE-2025-1288 | 1 Bulktheme | 1 Wooexim | 2025-06-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WOOEXIM WordPress plugin through 5.0.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make an unauthenticated user vulnerable to reflected XSS via a CSRF attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5885 | 2025-06-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in Konica Minolta bizhub up to 20250202 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49511 | 2025-06-12 | 7.1 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in uxper Civi Framework allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Civi Framework: from n/a through 2.1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-49510 | 2025-06-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPFactory Min Max Step Quantity Limits Manager for WooCommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Min Max Step Quantity Limits Manager for WooCommerce: from n/a through 5.1.0. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5925 | 2025-06-12 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Bunny’s Print CSS plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.95. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the pcss_options_subpanel() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-8398 | 1 Philipwalton | 1 Simple Nav Archives | 2025-06-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Simple Nav Archives WordPress plugin through 2.1.3 does not have CSRF check in place when updating its settings, which could allow attackers to make a logged in admin change them via a CSRF attack | ||||