Search
Search Results (72449 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-39867 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Server | 2025-08-27 | 7.6 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 SP1). Affected devices do not properly validate the authentication when performing certain actions in the web interface allowing an unauthenticated attacker to access and edit device configuration information of devices for which they have no privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39866 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Server | 2025-08-27 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 SP1). The affected application allows users to upload encrypted backup files. This could allow an attacker with access to the backup encryption key and with the right to upload backup files to create a user with administrative privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39865 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Server | 2025-08-27 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 SP1). The affected application allows users to upload encrypted backup files. As part of this backup, files can be restored without correctly checking the path of the restored file. This could allow an attacker with access to the backup encryption key to upload malicious files, that could potentially lead to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39675 | 1 Siemens | 24 Ruggedcom Ros Rmc30, Ruggedcom Ros Rmc30nc, Ruggedcom Ros Rp110 and 21 more | 2025-08-27 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RP110NC (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS400NC (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS401NC (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416NC (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.9.0), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS910NC (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions < V4.3.10), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC (All versions), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions). In some configurations the affected products wrongly enable the Modbus service in non-managed VLANS. Only serial devices are affected by this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39571 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Server | 2025-08-27 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 HF1). Affected applications are vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading SNMP configurations. This could allow an attacker with the right to modify the SNMP configuration to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39570 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Server | 2025-08-27 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Server (All versions < V3.2 HF1). Affected applications are vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading VxLAN configurations. This could allow an authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39568 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Client | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Client (All versions < V3.2 HF1). The system service of affected applications is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading proxy configurations. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to execute arbitrary code with system privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-39567 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sinema Remote Connect Client | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SINEMA Remote Connect Client (All versions < V3.2 HF1). The system service of affected applications is vulnerable to command injection due to missing server side input sanitation when loading VPN configurations. This could allow an authenticated local attacker to execute arbitrary code with system privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2024-37997 | 1 Siemens | 2 Jt Open, Plm Xml Sdk | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in JT Open (All versions < V11.5), JT2Go (All versions < V2406.0003), PLM XML SDK (All versions < V7.1.0.014), Teamcenter Visualization V14.2 (All versions < V14.2.0.13), Teamcenter Visualization V14.3 (All versions < V14.3.0.11), Teamcenter Visualization V2312 (All versions < V2312.0008), Teamcenter Visualization V2406 (All versions < V2406.0003). The affected applications contain a stack based overflow vulnerability while parsing specially crafted XML files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32057 | 1 Siemens | 3 Ps\/iges Parasolid Translator, Ps Iges Parasolid Translator Component, Simcenter Femap | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2406). The affected application contains a type confusion vulnerability while parsing IGS files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. (ZDI-CAN-21562) | ||||
| CVE-2024-32056 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simcenter Femap | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2406). The affected application contains an out of bounds write past the end of an allocated buffer while parsing a specially crafted IGS part file. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-32055 | 1 Siemens | 3 Ps\/iges Parasolid Translator, Ps Iges Parasolid Translator Component, Simcenter Femap | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Simcenter Femap (All versions < V2406). The affected applications contain an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted IGS files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2023-7066 | 1 Siemens | 2 Jt2go, Teamcenter Visualization | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| The affected applications contain an out of bounds read past the end of an allocated structure while parsing specially crafted PDF files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52237 | 1 Siemens | 80 Ruggedcom I800, Ruggedcom I800nc, Ruggedcom I801 and 77 more | 2025-08-27 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800, RUGGEDCOM i800NC, RUGGEDCOM i801, RUGGEDCOM i801NC, RUGGEDCOM i802, RUGGEDCOM i802NC, RUGGEDCOM i803, RUGGEDCOM i803NC, RUGGEDCOM M2100, RUGGEDCOM M2100NC, RUGGEDCOM M2200, RUGGEDCOM M2200NC, RUGGEDCOM M969, RUGGEDCOM M969NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC30, RUGGEDCOM RMC30NC, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RMC8388NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RP110, RUGGEDCOM RP110NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600, RUGGEDCOM RS1600F, RUGGEDCOM RS1600FNC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600NC, RUGGEDCOM RS1600T, RUGGEDCOM RS1600TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS400, RUGGEDCOM RS400NC, RUGGEDCOM RS401, RUGGEDCOM RS401NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416, RUGGEDCOM RS416NC, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416NCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416P, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNC, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416PNCv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS8000, RUGGEDCOM RS8000A, RUGGEDCOM RS8000ANC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000H, RUGGEDCOM RS8000HNC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000NC, RUGGEDCOM RS8000T, RUGGEDCOM RS8000TNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GNC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900GP, RUGGEDCOM RS900GPNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900L, RUGGEDCOM RS900LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-GETS-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX, RUGGEDCOM RS900MNC-STND-XX-C01, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RS900W, RUGGEDCOM RS910, RUGGEDCOM RS910L, RUGGEDCOM RS910LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS910NC, RUGGEDCOM RS910W, RUGGEDCOM RS920L, RUGGEDCOM RS920LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS920W, RUGGEDCOM RS930L, RUGGEDCOM RS930LNC, RUGGEDCOM RS930W, RUGGEDCOM RS940G, RUGGEDCOM RS940GNC, RUGGEDCOM RS969, RUGGEDCOM RS969NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100NC(32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2100PNC (32M) V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200, RUGGEDCOM RSG2200NC, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2288NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2300PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG2488NC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG907R, RUGGEDCOM RSG908C, RUGGEDCOM RSG909R, RUGGEDCOM RSG910C, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V4.X, RUGGEDCOM RSG920PNC V5.X, RUGGEDCOM RSL910, RUGGEDCOM RSL910NC, RUGGEDCOM RST2228, RUGGEDCOM RST2228P, RUGGEDCOM RST916C, RUGGEDCOM RST916P. The web server of the affected devices allow a low privileged user to access hashes and password salts of all system's users, including admin users. An attacker could use the obtained information to brute force the passwords offline. | ||||
| CVE-2023-4807 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| Issue summary: The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation contains a bug that might corrupt the internal state of applications on the Windows 64 platform when running on newer X86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. Impact summary: If in an application that uses the OpenSSL library an attacker can influence whether the POLY1305 MAC algorithm is used, the application state might be corrupted with various application dependent consequences. The POLY1305 MAC (message authentication code) implementation in OpenSSL does not save the contents of non-volatile XMM registers on Windows 64 platform when calculating the MAC of data larger than 64 bytes. Before returning to the caller all the XMM registers are set to zero rather than restoring their previous content. The vulnerable code is used only on newer x86_64 processors supporting the AVX512-IFMA instructions. The consequences of this kind of internal application state corruption can be various - from no consequences, if the calling application does not depend on the contents of non-volatile XMM registers at all, to the worst consequences, where the attacker could get complete control of the application process. However given the contents of the registers are just zeroized so the attacker cannot put arbitrary values inside, the most likely consequence, if any, would be an incorrect result of some application dependent calculations or a crash leading to a denial of service. The POLY1305 MAC algorithm is most frequently used as part of the CHACHA20-POLY1305 AEAD (authenticated encryption with associated data) algorithm. The most common usage of this AEAD cipher is with TLS protocol versions 1.2 and 1.3 and a malicious client can influence whether this AEAD cipher is used by the server. This implies that server applications using OpenSSL can be potentially impacted. However we are currently not aware of any concrete application that would be affected by this issue therefore we consider this a Low severity security issue. As a workaround the AVX512-IFMA instructions support can be disabled at runtime by setting the environment variable OPENSSL_ia32cap: OPENSSL_ia32cap=:~0x200000 The FIPS provider is not affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38545 | 5 Fedoraproject, Haxx, Microsoft and 2 more | 19 Fedora, Libcurl, Windows 10 1809 and 16 more | 2025-08-27 | 8.8 High |
| This flaw makes curl overflow a heap based buffer in the SOCKS5 proxy handshake. When curl is asked to pass along the host name to the SOCKS5 proxy to allow that to resolve the address instead of it getting done by curl itself, the maximum length that host name can be is 255 bytes. If the host name is detected to be longer, curl switches to local name resolving and instead passes on the resolved address only. Due to this bug, the local variable that means "let the host resolve the name" could get the wrong value during a slow SOCKS5 handshake, and contrary to the intention, copy the too long host name to the target buffer instead of copying just the resolved address there. The target buffer being a heap based buffer, and the host name coming from the URL that curl has been told to operate with. | ||||
| CVE-2023-23379 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Defender For Iot | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Defender for IoT Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-45147 | 1 Siemens | 2 Simatic Pcs Neo, Simatic Step 7 | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC PCS neo V4.0 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V16 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V17 (All versions), SIMATIC STEP 7 V18 (All versions < V18 Update 2). Affected applications do not properly restrict the .NET BinaryFormatter when deserializing user-controllable input. This could allow an attacker to cause a type confusion and execute arbitrary code within the affected application. This is the same issue that exists for .NET BinaryFormatter https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/visualstudio/code-quality/ca2300. | ||||
| CVE-2022-44696 | 1 Microsoft | 2 365 Apps, Office | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office Visio Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2022-44691 | 1 Microsoft | 3 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel | 2025-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| Microsoft Office OneNote Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||