| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Paranoidhttp before 0.3.0 allows SSRF because [::] is equivalent to the 127.0.0.1 address, but does not match the filter for private addresses. |
| isInList in the safeurl-python package before 1.2 for Python has an insufficiently restrictive regular expression for external domains, leading to SSRF. |
| A blind SSRF vulnerability was identified in all versions of GitLab EE prior to 15.4.6, 15.5 prior to 15.5.5, and 15.6 prior to 15.6.1 which allows an attacker to connect to a local host. |
| A blind SSRF in GitLab CE/EE affecting all from 11.3 prior to 15.4.6, 15.5 prior to 15.5.5, and 15.6 prior to 15.6.1 allows an attacker to connect to local addresses when configuring a malicious GitLab Runner. |
| A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in Tenable.sc due to improper validation of session & user-accessible input data. A privileged, authenticated remote attacker could interact with external and internal services covertly. |
| Haven 5d15944 allows Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the feed[url]= Feeds functionality. Authenticated users with the ability to create new RSS Feeds or add RSS Feeds can supply an arbitrary hostname (or even the hostname of the Haven server itself). NOTE: this product has significant usage but does not have numbered releases; ordinary end users may typically use the master branch. |
| AMI Megarac Weak password hashes for
Redfish & API |
| In dotCMS 5.x-22.06, TempFileAPI allows a user to create a temporary file based on a passed in URL, while attempting to block any SSRF access to local IP addresses or private subnets. In resolving this URL, the TempFileAPI follows any 302 redirects that the remote URL returns. Because there is no re-validation of the redirect URL, the TempFileAPI can be used to return data from those local/private hosts that should not be accessible remotely. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an unauthenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in the APROL Web Portal used in B&R APROL <4.4-00P5 may allow an authenticated network-based attacker to force the web server to request arbitrary URLs. |
| The Zapier for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.1 via the updated_user() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| Icinga Reporting is the central component for reporting related functionality in the monitoring web frontend and framework Icinga Web 2. A vulnerability present in versions 0.10.0 through 1.0.2 allows to set up a template that allows to embed arbitrary Javascript. This enables the attacker to act on behalf of the user, if the template is being previewed; and act on behalf of the headless browser, if a report using the template is printed to PDF. This issue has been resolved in version 1.0.3 of Icinga Reporting. As a workaround, review all templates and remove suspicious settings. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in SuitePlugins Video & Photo Gallery for Ultimate Member allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Video & Photo Gallery for Ultimate Member: from n/a through 1.1.2. |
| Mesop is a Python-based UI framework that allows users to build web applications. A class pollution vulnerability in Mesop prior to version 0.14.1 allows attackers to overwrite global variables and class attributes in certain Mesop modules during runtime. This vulnerability could directly lead to a denial of service (DoS) attack against the server. Additionally, it could also result in other severe consequences given the application's implementation, such as identity confusion, where an attacker could impersonate an assistant or system role within conversations. This impersonation could potentially enable jailbreak attacks when interacting with large language models (LLMs). Just like the Javascript's prototype pollution, this vulnerability could leave a way for attackers to manipulate the intended data-flow or control-flow of the application at runtime and lead to severe consequences like remote code execution when gadgets are available. Users should upgrade to version 0.14.1 to obtain a fix for the issue. |
| Phpgurukul Online Birth Certificate System 1.0 suffers from insufficient password requirements which can lead to unauthorized access to user accounts. |
| The Order Export & Order Import for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.0 via the validate_file() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. |
| PublicCMS v4.0.202302.e was discovered to contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the component /admin/#maintenance_sysTask/edit. |
| Versions of the package nossrf before 1.0.4 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) where an attacker can provide a hostname that resolves to a local or reserved IP address space and bypass the SSRF protection mechanism. |
| A XSLT Server Side injection vulnerability in the Import Jobs function of FireBear Improved Import And Export v3.8.6 allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted XSLT file. |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Group Arge Energy and Control Systems Smartpower Web allows : Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects Smartpower Web: before 23.01.01.
|
