| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Extproc in Oracle 9i and 10g does not require authentication to load a library or execute a function, which allows local users to execute arbitrary commands as the Oracle user. |
| Buffer overflows in PL/SQL module 3.0.9.8.2 in Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2.x allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via (1) a long help page request without a dadname, which overflows the resulting HTTP Location header, (2) a long HTTP request to the plsql module, (3) a long password in the HTTP Authorization, (4) a long Access Descriptor (DAD) password in the addadd form, or (5) a long cache directory name. |
| The default configuration of Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2.x running Oracle JSP or SQLJSP stores globals.jsa under the web root, which allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information including usernames and passwords via a direct HTTP request to globals.jsa. |
| The default configuration of Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2.x allows remote anonymous users to access sensitive services without authentication, including Dynamic Monitoring Services (1) dms0, (2) dms/DMSDump, (3) servlet/DMSDump, (4) servlet/Spy, (5) soap/servlet/Spy, and (6) dms/AggreSpy; and Oracle Java Process Manager (7) oprocmgr-status and (8) oprocmgr-service, which can be used to control Java processes. |
| PL/SQL module 3.0.9.8.2 in Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2.x allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via an HTTP Authorization header without an authentication type. |
| Oracle 9i Application Server stores XSQL and SOAP configuration files insecurely, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information including usernames and passwords by requesting (1) XSQLConfig.xml or (2) soapConfig.xml through a virtual directory. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Oracle Application Server (OracleAS) Discussion Forum Portlet allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the (1) RowKeyValue parameter in the PORTAL schema; and the (2) title and (3) content input fields when creating an forum article. |
| Format string vulnerability in certain third party modifications to mod_dav for logging bad gateway messages (e.g. Oracle9i Application Server 9.0.2) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a destination URI that forces a "502 Bad Gateway" response, which causes the format string specifiers to be returned from dav_lookup_uri() in mod_dav.c, which is then used in a call to ap_log_rerror(). |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC01 in the Protocol Support component. |
| rwcgi60 CGI program in Oracle Reports Server, by design, provides sensitive information such as the full pathname, which could enable remote attackers to use the information in additional attacks. |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Oracle Java Server Page (OJSP) demo files (1) hellouser.jsp, (2) welcomeuser.jsp and (3) usebean.jsp in Oracle 9i Application Server 9.0.2, 1.0.2.2, 1.0.2.1s and 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the text entry field. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Reports Developer component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0.2 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# REP03. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in OC4J for Oracle Application Server 9.0.2.3, 9.0.3.1, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.0 has unknown impact and attack vectors, aka Oracle Vuln# (1) AS05 and (2) AS08. |
| Buffer overflow in Oracle9iAS Web Cache 2.0.0.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long HTTP GET request. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0.2, and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10, have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) FORM01 and (2) FORM02 in the Oracle Forms component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Net component of Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.4, and Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# JN01. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Application Server 6.0.8.26(PS17) and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) REP05 and (2) REP06 in the Oracle Reports Developer component. NOTE: Oracle has not disputed reliable researcher claims that REP05 is the same as CVE-2005-2378 and REP06 is the same as CVE-2005-2371, both of which involve directory traversal. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle PL/SQL (PLSQL), as used in Database Server DS 9.2.0.7 and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, 10.1.2.0.2, 10.1.2.1.0, and 10.1.3.0.0, E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10, and Collaboration Suite 10.1.1, 10.1.2.0, 10.1.2.1, and 9.0.4.2, allows attackers to bypass the PLSQLExclusion list and access excluded packages and procedures, aka Vuln# PLSQL01. |
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in Oracle 10g Release 1 before CPU Jan 2006 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via multiple parameters in (1) ATTACH_JOB, (2) HAS_PRIVS, and (3) OPEN_JOB functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT package; and (4) UPDATE_JOB, (5) ACTIVE_JOB, (6) ATTACH_POSSIBLE, (7) ATTACH_TO_JOB, (8) CREATE_NEW_JOB, (9) DELETE_JOB, (10) DELETE_MASTER_TABLE, (11) DETACH_JOB, (12) GET_JOB_INFO, (13) GET_JOB_QUEUES, (14) GET_SOLE_JOBNAME, (15) MASTER_TBL_LOCK, and (16) VALID_HANDLE functions in the SYS.KUPV$FT_INT package. NOTE: due to the lack of relevant details from the Oracle advisory, a separate CVE is being created since it cannot be conclusively proven that these issues has been addressed by Oracle. It is unclear which, if any, Oracle Vuln# identifiers apply to these issues. |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6d and earlier, and 0.9.7-beta2 and earlier, does not properly handle ASCII representations of integers on 64 bit platforms, which could allow attackers to cause a denial of service and possibly execute arbitrary code. |
