Search Results (40752 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-46730 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Ensure array index tg_inst won't be -1 [WHY & HOW] tg_inst will be a negative if timing_generator_count equals 0, which should be checked before used. This fixes 2 OVERRUN issues reported by Coverity.
CVE-2024-46728 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Check index for aux_rd_interval before using aux_rd_interval has size of 7 and should be checked. This fixes 3 OVERRUN and 1 INTEGER_OVERFLOW issues reported by Coverity.
CVE-2024-26913 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-07-11 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: Fix dcn35 8k30 Underflow/Corruption Issue [why] odm calculation is missing for pipe split policy determination and cause Underflow/Corruption issue. [how] Add the odm calculation.
CVE-2023-52436 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-07-11 7.8 High
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: explicitly null-terminate the xattr list When setting an xattr, explicitly null-terminate the xattr list. This eliminates the fragile assumption that the unused xattr space is always zeroed.
CVE-2022-48979 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/amd/display: fix array index out of bound error in DCN32 DML [Why&How] LinkCapacitySupport array is indexed with the number of voltage states and not the number of max DPPs. Fix the error by changing the array declaration to use the correct (larger) array size of total number of voltage states.
CVE-2021-47275 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bcache: avoid oversized read request in cache missing code path In the cache missing code path of cached device, if a proper location from the internal B+ tree is matched for a cache miss range, function cached_dev_cache_miss() will be called in cache_lookup_fn() in the following code block, [code block 1] 526 unsigned int sectors = KEY_INODE(k) == s->iop.inode 527 ? min_t(uint64_t, INT_MAX, 528 KEY_START(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector) 529 : INT_MAX; 530 int ret = s->d->cache_miss(b, s, bio, sectors); Here s->d->cache_miss() is the call backfunction pointer initialized as cached_dev_cache_miss(), the last parameter 'sectors' is an important hint to calculate the size of read request to backing device of the missing cache data. Current calculation in above code block may generate oversized value of 'sectors', which consequently may trigger 2 different potential kernel panics by BUG() or BUG_ON() as listed below, 1) BUG_ON() inside bch_btree_insert_key(), [code block 2] 886 BUG_ON(b->ops->is_extents && !KEY_SIZE(k)); 2) BUG() inside biovec_slab(), [code block 3] 51 default: 52 BUG(); 53 return NULL; All the above panics are original from cached_dev_cache_miss() by the oversized parameter 'sectors'. Inside cached_dev_cache_miss(), parameter 'sectors' is used to calculate the size of data read from backing device for the cache missing. This size is stored in s->insert_bio_sectors by the following lines of code, [code block 4] 909 s->insert_bio_sectors = min(sectors, bio_sectors(bio) + reada); Then the actual key inserting to the internal B+ tree is generated and stored in s->iop.replace_key by the following lines of code, [code block 5] 911 s->iop.replace_key = KEY(s->iop.inode, 912 bio->bi_iter.bi_sector + s->insert_bio_sectors, 913 s->insert_bio_sectors); The oversized parameter 'sectors' may trigger panic 1) by BUG_ON() from the above code block. And the bio sending to backing device for the missing data is allocated with hint from s->insert_bio_sectors by the following lines of code, [code block 6] 926 cache_bio = bio_alloc_bioset(GFP_NOWAIT, 927 DIV_ROUND_UP(s->insert_bio_sectors, PAGE_SECTORS), 928 &dc->disk.bio_split); The oversized parameter 'sectors' may trigger panic 2) by BUG() from the agove code block. Now let me explain how the panics happen with the oversized 'sectors'. In code block 5, replace_key is generated by macro KEY(). From the definition of macro KEY(), [code block 7] 71 #define KEY(inode, offset, size) \ 72 ((struct bkey) { \ 73 .high = (1ULL << 63) | ((__u64) (size) << 20) | (inode), \ 74 .low = (offset) \ 75 }) Here 'size' is 16bits width embedded in 64bits member 'high' of struct bkey. But in code block 1, if "KEY_START(k) - bio->bi_iter.bi_sector" is very probably to be larger than (1<<16) - 1, which makes the bkey size calculation in code block 5 is overflowed. In one bug report the value of parameter 'sectors' is 131072 (= 1 << 17), the overflowed 'sectors' results the overflowed s->insert_bio_sectors in code block 4, then makes size field of s->iop.replace_key to be 0 in code block 5. Then the 0- sized s->iop.replace_key is inserted into the internal B+ tree as cache missing check key (a special key to detect and avoid a racing between normal write request and cache missing read request) as, [code block 8] 915 ret = bch_btree_insert_check_key(b, &s->op, &s->iop.replace_key); Then the 0-sized s->iop.replace_key as 3rd parameter triggers the bkey size check BUG_ON() in code block 2, and causes the kernel panic 1). Another ke ---truncated---
CVE-2025-27690 1 Dell 1 Powerscale Onefs 2025-07-11 9.8 Critical
Dell PowerScale OneFS, versions 9.5.0.0 through 9.10.1.0, contains a use of default password vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to the takeover of a high privileged user account.
CVE-2025-47174 1 Microsoft 6 365 Apps, Excel, Office and 3 more 2025-07-11 7.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Excel allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2025-47169 1 Microsoft 6 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel and 3 more 2025-07-11 7.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2025-33055 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in Windows Storage Management Provider allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2025-24065 1 Microsoft 10 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 22h2, Windows 11 22h2 and 7 more 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in Windows Storage Management Provider allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2025-24069 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in Windows Storage Management Provider allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2025-24068 1 Microsoft 17 Windows, Windows 10, Windows 10 1507 and 14 more 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
Buffer over-read in Windows Storage Management Provider allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2025-26269 1 Dragonflydb 1 Dragonfly 2025-07-11 3.3 Low
DragonflyDB Dragonfly through 1.28.2 (fixed in 1.29.0) allows authenticated users to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a Lua library command that references a large negative integer.
CVE-2025-32717 1 Microsoft 5 365 Apps, Office, Office 365 and 2 more 2025-07-11 8.4 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office Word allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2025-47162 1 Microsoft 3 365 Apps, Office, Office Long Term Servicing Channel 2025-07-11 8.4 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Office allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2025-33066 1 Microsoft 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more 2025-07-11 8.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2025-33065 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 10 more 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in Windows Storage Management Provider allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2025-33064 1 Microsoft 15 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 12 more 2025-07-11 8.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2025-33063 1 Microsoft 11 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 8 more 2025-07-11 5.5 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in Windows Storage Management Provider allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.