| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper Authentication vulnerability in ABB Terra AC wallbox (UL40/80A), ABB Terra AC wallbox (UL32A), ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) (Terra AC MID), ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC Juno CE, ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC PTB, ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) Symbiosis, ABB Terra AC wallbox (JP).This issue affects Terra AC wallbox (UL40/80A): from 1.0;0 through 1.5.5; Terra AC wallbox (UL32A) : from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5; Terra AC wallbox (CE) (Terra AC MID): from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5; Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC Juno CE: from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5; Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC PTB : from 1.0;0 through 1.5.25; Terra AC wallbox (CE) Symbiosis: from 1.0;0 through 1.2.7; Terra AC wallbox (JP): from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5.
|
| Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability in ABB Terra AC wallbox (UL40/80A), ABB Terra AC wallbox (UL32A), ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) (Terra AC MID), ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC Juno CE, ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC PTB, ABB Terra AC wallbox (CE) Symbiosis, ABB Terra AC wallbox (JP).This issue affects Terra AC wallbox (UL40/80A): from 1.0;0 through 1.5.5; Terra AC wallbox (UL32A) : from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5; Terra AC wallbox (CE) (Terra AC MID): from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5; Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC Juno CE: from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5; Terra AC wallbox (CE) Terra AC PTB : from 1.0;0 through 1.5.25; Terra AC wallbox (CE) Symbiosis: from 1.0;0 through 1.2.7; Terra AC wallbox (JP): from 1.0;0 through 1.6.5.
|
| Sensitive information disclosure due to insecure registry permissions. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 30025, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 30984. |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper authorization. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 28610, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Linux, macOS, Windows) before build 30984. |
| Local privilege escalation due to unrestricted loading of unsigned libraries. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect Home Office (Windows) before build 40208. |
| PrinterLogic Windows Client through 25.0.0.676 allows attackers to execute directory traversal. Authenticated users with prior knowledge of the driver filename could exploit this to escalate privileges or distribute malicious content. This issue has been resolved in PrinterLogic Windows Client 25.0.0688 and all affected are advised to upgrade. |
| OpenText Documentum Content Server before 23.2 has a flaw that allows for privilege escalation from a non-privileged Documentum user to root. The software comes prepackaged with a root owned SUID binary dm_secure_writer. The binary has security controls in place preventing creation of a file in a non-owned directory, or as the root user. However, these controls can be carefully bypassed to allow for an arbitrary file write as root. |
| Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like `parameters`, `image` and `entrypoint` to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to unintended use of the secret value, and increased risk of exposing the secret during image execution bypassing log masking. **To exploit this** the pipeline author must be supplying the secrets to a plugin that is designed in such a way that will print those parameters in logs. Plugin parameters are not designed for sensitive values and are often intentionally printed throughout execution for informational/debugging purposes. Parameters should therefore be treated as insensitive. While Vela provides secrets masking, secrets exposure is not entirely solved by the masking process. A docker image (plugin) can easily expose secrets if they are not handled properly, or altered in some way. There is a responsibility on the end-user to understand how values injected into a plugin are used. This is a risk that exists for many CICD systems (like GitHub Actions) that handle sensitive runtime variables. Rather, the greater risk is that users who restrict a secret to the "no commands" option and use image restriction can still have their secret value exposed via substitution tinkering, which turns the image and command restrictions into a false sense of security. This issue has been addressed in version 0.23.2. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should not provide sensitive values to plugins that can potentially expose them, especially in `parameters` that are not intended to be used for sensitive values, ensure plugins (especially those that utilize shared secrets) follow best practices to avoid logging parameters that are expected to be sensitive, minimize secrets with `pull_request` events enabled, as this allows users to change pipeline configurations and pull in secrets to steps not typically part of the CI process, make use of the build approval setting, restricting builds from untrusted users, and limit use of shared secrets, as they are less restrictive to access by nature. |
| TLS/SSL weak cipher suites enabled. The following products are affected: Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows, Linux) before build 30984. |
| Local privilege escalation due to insecure folder permissions. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 30430, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 30984. |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper certification validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows) before build 29633, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows) before build 30984. |
| Sensitive information disclosure and manipulation due to improper certification validation. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (Windows, macOS, Linux) before build 29633, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (Windows, macOS, Linux) before build 30984. |
| zot is a production-ready vendor-neutral OCI image registry. The group data stored for users in the boltdb database (meta.db) is an append-list so group revocations/removals are ignored in the API. SetUserGroups is alled on login, but instead of replacing the group memberships, they are appended. This may be due to some conflict with the group definitions in the config file, but that wasn't obvious to me if it were the case. Any Zot configuration that relies on group-based authorization will not respect group remove/revocation by an IdP. This issue has been addressed in version 2.1.2. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. |
| Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running an untrusted recipe.
This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running an untrusted recipe in Jupyter Notebook.
The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over template variables.
|
| Insufficient sanitization in MLflow leads to XSS when running a recipe that uses an untrusted dataset. This issue leads to a client-side RCE when running the recipe in Jupyter Notebook. The vulnerability stems from lack of sanitization over dataset table fields. |
| In smp_proc_rand of smp_act.cc, there is a possible authentication bypass during legacy BLE pairing due to incorrect implementation of a protocol. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. |
| A authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Fortinet FortiClientWindows version 7.4.0, versions 7.2.4 through 7.2.0, versions 7.0.12 through 7.0.0, and 6.4.10 through 6.4.0 allows low privilege attacker to execute arbitrary code with high privilege via spoofed named pipe messages. |
| A client-side enforcement of server-side security in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer-BigData
at least version 7.4.0 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.6 and 7.0.1 through 7.0.6 and 6.4.5 through 6.4.7 and 6.2.5, FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.1 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.4 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.14, FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.1 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.4 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.11 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.14 allows attacker to improper access control via crafted requests. |
| An improper authorization vulnerability [CWE-285] in FortiSOAR version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3, 7.3.0 through 7.3.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 change password endpoint may allow an authenticated attacker to perform a brute force attack on users and administrators password via crafted HTTP requests. |
| MXsecurity version 1.0 is vulnearble to command injection vulnerability. This vulnerability has been reported in the SSH CLI program, which can be exploited by attackers who have gained authorization privileges. The attackers can break out of the restricted shell and subsequently execute arbitrary code.
|
