| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The Security/changepassword URL action in SilverStripe 2.3.x before 2.3.10 and 2.4.x before 2.4.4 passes a token as a GET parameter while changing a password through email, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive data and hijack the session via the HTTP referer logs on a server, aka "HTTP referer leakage." |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Shareaholic SexyBookmarks plugin 6.1.4.0 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that "manipulate plugin settings." |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Content Lock module for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Adobe ColdFusion 8.0, 8.0.1, 9.0, and 9.0.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in index/manager/fileUpload in Public Knowledge Project Open Harvester Systems 2.3.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that upload PHP files. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the SimpleMeta module 6.x-1.x before 6.x-2.0 for Drupal allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) delete or (2) add a meta tag entry. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the CDN2 Video module 6.x for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the customizer in WordPress before 3.4.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Coursemill Learning Management System (LMS) 6.8 constructs secret tokens based on time values, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks via vectors related to cookies, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-3605. |
| inc/central.class.php in GLPI before 0.84.2 does not attempt to make install/install.php unavailable after an installation is completed, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, and (1) perform a SQL injection via an Etape_4 action or (2) execute arbitrary PHP code via an update_1 action. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the IndiaNIC Testimonial plugin 2.2 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add a testimonial via an iNIC_testimonial_save action; (2) add a listing template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_listing_template action; (3) add a widget template via an iNIC_testimonial_save_widget action; insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (4) project_name, (5) project_url, (6) client_name, (7) client_city, (8) client_state, (9) description, (10) tags, (11) video_url, or (12) is_featured, (13) title, (14) widget_title, (15) no_of_testimonials, (16) filter_by_country, (17) filter_by_tags, or (18) widget_template parameter to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Subrion CMS before 2.2.3 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that add, delete, or modify sensitive information, as demonstrated by adding an administrator account via an add action to admin/accounts/add/. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Advantech/BroadWin WebAccess 7.0 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-0235. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Data Quality Console and Information Analyzer components in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 8.7 through FP2 and 9.1 through 9.1.2.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mibew Messenger 1.6.4 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of operators for requests that insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences via the (1) address or (2) threadid parameters to operator/ban.php; or (3) geolinkparams, (4) title, or (5) chattitle parameters to operator/settings.php. |
| J-Web in Juniper Junos before 10.4R13, 11.4 before 11.4R7, 12.1R before 12.1R6, 12.1X44 before 12.1X44-D15, 12.1x45 before 12.1X45-D10, 12.2 before 12.2R3, 12.3 before 12.3R2, and 13.1 before 13.1R3 allow remote attackers to bypass the cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection mechanism and hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create new administrator accounts or (2) have other unspecified impacts. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Master Data Management - Collaborative Edition 10.x before 10.1 FP8 through 11.0 and InfoSphere Master Data Management Server for Product Information Management 9.0 and 9.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Administrative Console in IBM WebSphere Application Server (WAS) 6.1 before 6.1.0.35 and 7.0 before 7.0.0.13 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in admin.php in PBBoard 2.1.4 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) upload a file via an add action or (2) change the contents of a file via a dit action. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Cumin before 0.1.5444, as used in Red Hat Enterprise Messaging, Realtime, and Grid (MRG) 2.0, allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that execute commands via unspecified vectors. |
