| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Oracle Java Virtual Machine (JVM ) for Oracle 8.1.7 and Oracle Application Server 9iAS Release 1.0.2.0.1 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via the .jsp and .sqljsp file extensions when the server is configured to use the <<ALL FILES>> FilePermission. |
| Oracle Database 9.2.0.0 to 10.2.0.3 allows local users with "SELECT" privileges for a base table to insert, update, or delete data by creating a crafted view then performing the operations on that view. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Portal component of Oracle Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.0 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# AS01. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) OCS01, 2) OCS02, 3) OCS03, 4) OCS04, 5) OCS05, 6) OCS06, 7) OCS07, (8) OCS08, and (9) OCS09 in the (a) Email Server component; 10) OCS10 (and (11) OCS11 in the (b) Oracle Collaboration Suite Wireless & Voice (component; 12) OCS12 and (13) OCS13 in the (c) Oracle Content (Management SDK component; 14) OCS14 and (15) OCS15 in the (d) Oracle (Content Services component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.7, and 10.1.0.5, Application Server 1.0.2.2, 9.0.4.2, and 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC01 in the Protocol Support component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Diagnostics module 2.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to access diagnostics tests via unknown attack vectors. |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Oracle Database server 9.2.0.7 and 10.1.0.5 have unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# (1) DB05 in the (a) Data Pump component; (2) DB15 in the (b) Oracle Text component; (3) DB22 in the (c) Streams Apply component; (4) DB23 and (5) DB24 in the (d) Streams Capture component; and (6) DB26 in the (e) Streams Subcomponent. NOTE: details are unavailable from Oracle, but they have not publicly disputed a claim by a reliable independent researcher that states that DB05 involves SQL injection in the (f) LONG2VARCHAR, LONG2VCMAX, LONG2VCNT, and LONG2CLOB functions in the DBMS_METADATA_UTIL package; (g) MAKE_FILTER, FETCH_VIEWS_ERROR, FETCH_FILTERS, FETCH_VIEWS, SET_FILTER_COMMON, DO_FILTER_SCRIPT, SET_TABLE_FILTERS, and MAKE_FILTER_TEXT functions in the DBMS_METADATA_INT package; and (h) GET_PREPOST_TABLE_ACT function in the DBMS_METADATA package. |
| Oracle Webserver 2.1, when serving PL/SQL stored procedures, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a long HTTP GET request. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in the PL/SQL EXTPROC functionality for Oracle9i Database Release 2 and 1, and Oracle 8i, allows authenticated database users, and arbitrary database users in some cases, to execute arbitrary code via a long library name. |
| Buffer overflow in the KSDWRTB function in the dbms_system package (dbms_system.ksdwrt) for Oracle 9i Database Server Release 2 9.2.0.3 and 9.2.0.4, 9i Release 1 9.0.1.4 and 9.0.1.5, and 8i Release 1 8.1.7.4, allows remote authorized users to execute arbitrary code via a long second argument. |
| Oracle Database Server 8.1.7.4 through 9.2.0.4 allows local users to execute commands with additional privileges via the ctxsys.driload package, which is publicly accessible. |
| The (1) dbsnmp and (2) nmo programs in Oracle 8i, Oracle 9i, and Oracle IAS 9.0.2.0.1, on Unix systems, use a default path to find and execute library files while operating at raised privileges, which allows certain Oracle user accounts to gain root privileges via a modified libclntsh.so.9.0. |
| Buffer overflows in PL/SQL module 3.0.9.8.2 in Oracle 9i Application Server 1.0.2.x allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code via (1) a long help page request without a dadname, which overflows the resulting HTTP Location header, (2) a long HTTP request to the plsql module, (3) a long password in the HTTP Authorization, (4) a long Access Descriptor (DAD) password in the addadd form, or (5) a long cache directory name. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 10.1.0.4.2, Application Server 10.1.2.0.2, and Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i) has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DBC02 in the Reorganize Objects & Convert Tablespace component. |
| SQL injection vulnerability in Oracle Reports that use Lexical References allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the values in the parameter form that appears when the paramform parameter is set to yes. |
| Oracle listener process on Windows NT redirects connection requests to another port and creates a separate thread to process the request, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by repeatedly connecting to the Oracle listener but not connecting to the redirected port. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Net Foundation Layer component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, 9.2.0.6, and 10.1.0.4 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB08. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Database Server 9.2.0.7, Application Server 9.0.4.2 and 10.1.2.1, Collaboration Suite Release 2, version 9.0.4.2 (Oracle9i), and E-Business Suite and Applications 11.5.10 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# WF01 in the Oracle Workflow Cartridge component. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Net Listener component of Oracle Database server 8.1.7.4, 9.0.1.5, 9.0.1.5 FIPS, and 9.2.0.7 has unspecified impact and attack vectors, as identified by Oracle Vuln# DB11. |
| Oracle 9i Application Server (Oracle9iAS) 9.0.2 allows remote attackers to poison the web cache, bypass web application firewall protection, and conduct XSS attacks via an HTTP request with both a "Transfer-Encoding: chunked" header and a Content-Length header, which causes Application Server to incorrectly handle and forward the body of the request in a way that causes the receiving server to process it as a separate HTTP request, aka "HTTP Request Smuggling." |