| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| The integrated web server in Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROX I (all versions) at port 10000/TCP could allow remote attackers to perform actions with the privileges of an authenticated user, provided the targeted user has an active session and is induced into clicking on a malicious link or into visiting a malicious website, aka CSRF. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in Meteocontrol WEB'log Basic 100 all versions, Light all versions, Pro all versions, and Pro Unlimited all versions. There is no CSRF Token generated per page or per function. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in pcsd web UI in pcs before 0.9.149. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in markposts.php in Moodle 3.0 through 3.0.3, 2.9 through 2.9.5, 2.8 through 2.8.11, 2.7 through 2.7.13 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that marks forum posts as read. |
| IBM Tivoli Key Lifecycle Manager 2.5 and 2.6 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. |
| In Hitachi Vantara Pentaho BA Platform through 8.0, a CSRF issue exists in the Business Analytics application. |
| The cp-contact-form-with-paypal (aka CP Contact Form with PayPal) plugin before 1.1.6 for WordPress has CSRF with resultant XSS, related to cp_contactformpp.php and cp_contactformpp_admin_int_list.inc.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in LetoDMS (formerly MyDMS) before 3.3.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| There are no Anti-CSRF tokens in any forms on the web interface in Kaspersky Anti-Virus for Linux File Server before Maintenance Pack 2 Critical Fix 4 (version 8.0.4.312). This would allow an attacker to submit authenticated requests when an authenticated user browses an attacker-controlled domain. |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS 4.2.16 with the value[#][*] parameter to the admin/settings/update/ page. The Navigation Social can be changed. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery issue was discovered in OSIsoft PI Web API versions prior to 2017 (1.9.0). The vulnerability allows cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks to occur when an otherwise-unauthorized cross-site request is sent from a browser the server has previously authenticated. |
| atmail before 7.8.0.2 has CSRF, allowing an attacker to upload and import users via CSV. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ecrire/exec/valider_xml.php in SPIP 3.1.2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that execute the XML validator on a local file via a crafted valider_xml request. NOTE: this issue can be combined with CVE-2016-7998 to execute arbitrary PHP code. |
| Serendipity through 2.0.5 allows CSRF for the installation of an event plugin or a sidebar plugin. |
| PHP Scripts Mall Single Theater Booking has CSRF via admin/sitesettings.php. |
| In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) for adding a glossary. |
| In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/stat.ratings.php. |
| In phpMyFAQ before 2.9.9, there is Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in admin/stat.adminlog.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the widget-editing accessibility-mode feature in WordPress before 4.7.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that perform a widgets-access action, related to wp-admin/includes/class-wp-screen.php and wp-admin/widgets.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Simple Invoices 2013.1.beta.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of admins for requests that can (1) create new administrator user accounts and take over the entire application, (2) create regular user accounts, or (3) change configuration parameters such as tax rates and the enable/disable status of PayPal payment modules. |