Search

Search Results (399537 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-100503 2 Nationalsecurityagency, Nsa 2 Ghidra, Ghidra 2026-09-29 3.3 Low
Ghidra versions through 12.1.4 contain a heap use-after-free vulnerability in the decompiler's Funcdata::opInsertAfter function caused by stale INDIRECT effect-op references. Attackers can craft a malicious binary with a specific x86-64 sequence that triggers the vulnerability during decompilation, causing the decompile helper process to crash and denying service to analysts and automated analysis pipelines.
CVE-2026-100418 1 Pawelmalak 1 Flame 2026-09-29 5.3 Medium
Flame through 2.4.0 contains an information exposure vulnerability in the unauthenticated GET /api/config endpoint that returns the entire configuration object without field redaction. Attackers can retrieve the stored weather API key and internal operational settings by sending a single unauthenticated request to consume provider quota or access sensitive configuration data.
CVE-2026-100372 2 Clip-bucket, Macwarrior 2 Clipbucket, Clipbucket-v5 2026-09-29 7.2 High
ClipBucket v5 before 5.5.3-#197 contains a path traversal vulnerability in the admin template editor that allows authenticated administrators to overwrite PHP files by supplying directory traversal sequences in the folder parameter. Attackers with manage_template_access permission can traverse outside the layout directory to modify executable PHP files and achieve remote code execution as the web server user.
CVE-2026-100304 1 Tduckcloud 1 Tduck-survey-form 2026-09-29 5.3 Medium
TDuck survey form 6.0 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in FormAuthUtils.hasPermission that fails open when a form does not exist, allowing authenticated users to access deleted form submissions. Attackers can read orphaned submission data including personal information by providing a known dataId to the GET /user/form/data/details endpoint after the form has been permanently deleted.
CVE-2022-51019 1 Akaunting 1 Akaunting 2026-09-29 8.8 High
Akaunting before 2.1.31 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in the module installation and update flow where the alias parameter is passed unvalidated to shell command execution. Authenticated users with admin panel access can inject shell metacharacters into the alias parameter to execute arbitrary commands on the server.
CVE-2026-73599 2026-09-29 5.4 Medium
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
CVE-2026-100800 1 Mozilla 1 Firefox 2026-09-29 9.6 Critical
Sandbox escape due to use-after-free in the Disability Access APIs component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox ESR 153.4 and Firefox 157.
CVE-2026-97687 1 Urllib3 1 Urllib3 2026-09-29 N/A
urllib3 is an HTTP client library for Python. From 1.26.0 until 2.8.0, the proxy_ssl_context, proxy_assert_hostname, proxy_assert_fingerprint, ssl_context, cert_reqs, verify_mode, use_forwarding_for_https=True, and CERT_NONE configuration paths fail to remain separated because target-server TLS settings are incorrectly applied to the HTTPS proxy connection. The trigger is that an application uses an HTTPS proxy and configures target-server TLS settings that must remain separate from the proxy TLS handshake, including HTTPS forwarding with target-specific identity or credentials. Applying cert_reqs=CERT_NONE can overwrite proxy_ssl_context.verify_mode in place, and the mutation persists so later connections reusing the same context may connect to the HTTPS proxy without certificate verification. The attack mechanism is that an attacker intercepts and impersonates the HTTPS proxy after the effective proxy policy accepts the attacker's certificate. The impact is that the attacker can observe or modify forwarded traffic or receive a target TLS client certificate, while CONNECT tunneling still preserves the separate end-to-end target TLS connection. This issue is fixed in version 2.8.0.
CVE-2026-35189 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-09-29 N/A
Issue summary: A certificate with many nameRelativeToCRLIssuer CRL distribution points causes disproportionate heap growth when OpenSSL caches X.509 extensions. Impact summary: Receiving a crafted certificate from a malicious peer can lead to significant memory pressure and possible Denial of Service in clients or in servers that solicit client certificates. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: A certificate or a set of certificates that fits under the limit for size of certificates accepted from the peer (~100 KiB) can result in allocation of several hundred MiB of resident memory on the receiving side during a normal TLS handshake. This may be enough to crash the client or server, if multiple concurrent connections lead to similarly large memory allocations. The fix postpones processing of the CRL distribution points extensions in certificates to the time when the processed value is required for CRL processing. This avoids keeping large memory allocations for a long time when such certificates are received. FIPS impact: no The affected code is outside the FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-35191 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-09-29 N/A
Issue summary: The OpenSSL QUIC server, when configured to not preform address validation, can be forced to count incoming packets multiple times in its unvalidated credit computation, leading to a violation of the RFC 9000 unvalidated connection amplification limit of 3 times the amount of data received. Impact summary: A remote attacker able to spoof packets to a server using the OpenSSL QUIC implementation might use the server for an amplification of a DDoS attack. CWE: CWE-440: Expected Behavior Violation Description: OpenSSL's QUIC stack, when operating as a server, enforces client address validation (RFC 9000, Section 8), to confirm the peer address is not used for a traffic amplification attack. If this feature is disabled on the server, the QUIC stack limits the amount of server data that can be sent to 3 times the amount of data received from the peer address, until such time as the TLS handshake is completed. The OpenSSL QUIC server, when operating in non-validation mode, adds the length of the whole datagram received to the unvalidated credit limit when processing each QUIC packet in the datagram. A remote peer may, after establishing a connection with an initial client hello frame, send a subsequent datagram containing multiple QUIC packets, leading the server to account the entire datagram length for each packet in the datagram, resulting in the server believing that the peer has sent more data than it actually has, thereby violating the 3x amplification limit mandated by the RFC. FIPS impact: no As the QUIC stack lives outside the FIPS module boundary, no FIPS modules are affected by this CVE.
CVE-2026-54873 1 Openssl 1 Openssl 2026-09-29 N/A
Issue summary: QUIC process may keep memory for QUIC packet buffer for much longer period than necessary. Impact summary: Remote peer can exploit this vulnerability by sending maliciously crafted packets, making the local QUIC stack to keep the memory for packet buffers allocated. The time for which the memory remains allocated is entirely under the control of the potentially malicious remote peer. CWE: CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Description: To save copy operation from the packet buffer to the stream reassemble buffer the QUIC stack leaves the stream data on the packet buffer waiting to be copied to a buffer provided by the local receiving application. The QUIC stack releases a reference to the packet buffer only after the data are copied to the application buffer. This design is more efficient for legitimate data transfers but enables an attacker to allocate a lot more memory than actually required by the data kept in the receiving stream buffer. To mitigate the vulnerability, the QUIC stack now calculates and monitors memory overhead for every stream. The memory overhead for a single stream frame is calculated as a difference between the size of the whole packet that carries the stream frame and the size of the stream frame itself. The memory overhead for a single stream frame is added to the total (cumulative) memory overhead QUIC stack keeps for each stream. Once the cumulative memory overhead exceeds 64kB, the QUIC stack moves the stream frame data from the packet buffer to the stream buffer, starting with the next packet received. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
CVE-2026-100286 1 Devolutions 1 Server 2026-09-29 6.5 Medium
Missing authorization in the data source settings API in Devolutions Server 2026.3.5.0 and earlier allows an authenticated non-administrative user to disclose integration secrets via a crafted API request.
CVE-2026-100287 1 Devolutions 1 Server 2026-09-29 5.4 Medium
Missing authorization in the attachment history API in Devolutions Server 2026.3.5.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to permanently delete or restore vault attachments via a crafted API request.
CVE-2026-92368 1 Teamviewer 2 Full Client, Host 2026-09-29 7.8 High
TeamViewer Full Client and Host for Linux and macOS prior version 15.82 contain a heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the processing of .tvs session recording files. A size mismatch during decompression of recorded session data can result in out-of-bounds heap writes. By convincing a user to open a specially crafted session recording through the "Play or convert recorded session…" feature, an attacker may achieve arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the current user
CVE-2026-92371 1 Teamviewer 2 Full Client, Host 2026-09-29 7 High
TeamViewer Full Client and Host for Linux prior version 15.82 contains an improper path validation vulnerability in the Cloud Session Recording (CSR) functionality. By exploiting a race condition during path validation and subsequent file access, a local authenticated attacker may cause privileged file operations in unintended locations on the affected system.
CVE-2026-65127 2 Linux, Nvidia 3 Linux Kernel, Infra Controller, Infrastructure Controller 2026-09-29 4.1 Medium
NVIDIA Infrastructure Controller for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause exposure of sensitive system information due to uncleared debug information. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to information disclosure.
CVE-2026-65128 2 Linux, Nvidia 3 Linux Kernel, Infra Controller, Infrastructure Controller 2026-09-29 8.8 High
NVIDIA Infrastructure Controller for Linux contains a vulnerability where an attacker could cause SQL injection. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, data tampering, denial of service, and information disclosure.
CVE-2026-63006 1 Zammad 1 Zammad 2026-09-29 N/A
Zammad is a web based open source helpdesk/customer support system. Prior to 7.1.2, attacker-controlled HTML in inbound emails or tickets could bypass the image URL sanitizer using path traversal sequences. When an authenticated agent views the content, the browser resolves the URL to a protected API endpoint and sends the request with the agent's session cookie, enabling side effects such as forced logout without any user interaction. This issue is fixed in version 7.1.2.
CVE-2026-101091 2 B3log, Siyuan 2 Siyuan, Siyuan 2026-09-29 7.1 High
SiYuan versions before v3.8.4 fail to properly validate SQL statements in block query embed blocks executed against siyuan.db. Attackers can craft malicious .sy documents with non-read-only SQL statements that execute automatically during background indexing, rendering, or export operations without authentication.
CVE-2026-92370 1 Teamviewer 2 Full Client, Host 2026-09-29 8.8 High
An improper access control vulnerability in TeamViewer Full Client, Host, and related affected modules on Windows, Linux, and macOS allows an authenticated remote attacker to bypass user-configured permission settings during session establishment. By modifying access control parameters for restricted features, an attacker can perform actions that were explicitly denied by the victim's configuration. This may result in unauthorized actions and potentially lead to remote code execution on the target system.