Search
Search Results (424637 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-17124 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an out-of-bounds read. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17006 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-27 | 8.3 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a heap buffer overflow. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16991 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-27 | 7.8 High |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a local attacker to gain elevated privileges due to improper handling of symbolic links. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16919 | 1 Ibm | 3 Aix, Powervm Vios, Vios | 2026-08-27 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM AIX 7.2, and 7.3 and IBM PowerVM VIOS 4.1 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper validation of network-supplied pointers. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62300 | 1 Hcl Software | 1 Iem | 2026-08-27 | 5.9 Medium |
| HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is affected by a race condition. A "timing window" can occur where an attacker can modify the resource causing unpredictable behavior. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62299 | 1 Hcl Software | 1 Iem | 2026-08-27 | 6.6 Medium |
| HCL IntelliOps Event Management (IEM) is affected by a least privileges violation which could allow an attacker to access the resource with the elevated privilege that could not be accessed with the attacker's original privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43670 | 1 Apple | 5 Ios And Ipados, Ipados, Iphone Os and 2 more | 2026-08-27 | 8.8 High |
| A Content Security Policy bypass was addressed with improved enforcement in AudioWorklet contexts. This issue is fixed in Safari 26.5, iOS 18.7.9 and iPadOS 18.7.9, iOS 26.5 and iPadOS 26.5, macOS Tahoe 26.5. Processing maliciously crafted web content may bypass Content Security Policy. | ||||
| CVE-2021-48005 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-48004 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-48003 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-48002 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-48001 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-48000 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47999 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47998 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2021-47997 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-51007 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-51006 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-51005 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||
| CVE-2022-51004 | 2026-08-27 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected. | ||||