Total
5456 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-1000866 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Pipeline\, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Pipeline: Groovy Plugin 2.59 and earlier in groovy-sandbox/src/main/java/org/kohsuke/groovy/sandbox/SandboxTransformer.java, groovy-cps/lib/src/main/java/com/cloudbees/groovy/cps/SandboxCpsTransformer.java that allows attackers with Job/Configure permission, or unauthorized attackers with SCM commit privileges and corresponding pipelines based on Jenkinsfiles set up in Jenkins, to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM | ||||
| CVE-2018-1000865 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 3 Script Security, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A sandbox bypass vulnerability exists in Script Security Plugin 1.47 and earlier in groovy-sandbox/src/main/java/org/kohsuke/groovy/sandbox/SandboxTransformer.java that allows attackers with Job/Configure permission to execute arbitrary code on the Jenkins master JVM, if plugins using the Groovy sandbox are installed. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1000070 | 1 Bitmessage | 1 Pybitmessage | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Bitmessage PyBitmessage version v0.6.2 (and introduced in or after commit 8ce72d8d2d25973b7064b1cf76a6b0b3d62f0ba0) contains a Eval injection vulnerability in main program, file src/messagetypes/__init__.py function constructObject that can result in Code Execution. This attack appears to be exploitable via remote attacker using a malformed message which must be processed by the victim - e.g. arrive from any sender on bitmessage network. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in v0.6.3. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0675 | 1 Hibara | 1 Attachecase | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| AttacheCase ver.3.3.0.0 and earlier allows an arbitrary script execution via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0674 | 1 Hibara | 1 Attachecase | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| AttacheCase ver.2.8.4.0 and earlier allows an arbitrary script execution via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0461 | 1 Cisco | 7 Ip Phone 8800 Series Firmware, Ip Phone 8811, Ip Phone 8841 and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A vulnerability in the Cisco IP Phone 8800 Series Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct an arbitrary script injection attack on an affected device. The vulnerability exists because the software running on an affected device insufficiently validates user-supplied data. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a malicious link provided to the user or through the interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the user interface or access sensitive system-based information, which under normal circumstances should be prohibited. | ||||
| CVE-2018-0007 | 1 Juniper | 1 Junos | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| An unauthenticated network-based attacker able to send a maliciously crafted LLDP packet to the local segment, through a local segment broadcast, may be able to cause a Junos device to enter an improper boundary check condition allowing a memory corruption to occur, leading to a denial of service. Further crafted packets may be able to sustain the denial of service condition. Score: 6.5 MEDIUM (CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) Further, if the attacker is authenticated on the target device receiving and processing the malicious LLDP packet, while receiving the crafted packets, the attacker may be able to perform command or arbitrary code injection over the target device thereby elevating their permissions and privileges, and taking control of the device. Score: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) An unauthenticated network-based attacker able to send a maliciously crafted LLDP packet to one or more local segments, via LLDP proxy / tunneling agents or other LLDP through Layer 3 deployments, through one or more local segment broadcasts, may be able to cause multiple Junos devices to enter an improper boundary check condition allowing a memory corruption to occur, leading to multiple distributed Denials of Services. These Denials of Services attacks may have cascading Denials of Services to adjacent connected devices, impacts network devices, servers, workstations, etc. Further crafted packets may be able to sustain these Denials of Services conditions. Score 6.8 MEDIUM (CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H) Further, if the attacker is authenticated on one or more target devices receiving and processing these malicious LLDP packets, while receiving the crafted packets, the attacker may be able to perform command or arbitrary code injection over multiple target devices thereby elevating their permissions and privileges, and taking control multiple devices. Score: 7.8 HIGH (CVSS:3.0/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H) Affected releases are Juniper Networks Junos OS: 12.1X46 versions prior to 12.1X46-D71; 12.3 versions prior to 12.3R12-S7; 12.3X48 versions prior to 12.3X48-D55; 14.1 versions prior to 14.1R8-S5, 14.1R9; 14.1X53 versions prior to 14.1X53-D46, 14.1X53-D50, 14.1X53-D107; 14.2 versions prior to 14.2R7-S9, 14.2R8; 15.1 versions prior to 15.1F2-S17, 15.1F5-S8, 15.1F6-S8, 15.1R5-S7, 15.1R7; 15.1X49 versions prior to 15.1X49-D90; 15.1X53 versions prior to 15.1X53-D65; 16.1 versions prior to 16.1R4-S6, 16.1R5; 16.1X65 versions prior to 16.1X65-D45; 16.2 versions prior to 16.2R2; 17.1 versions prior to 17.1R2. No other Juniper Networks products or platforms are affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7798 | 3 Debian, Mozilla, Redhat | 9 Debian Linux, Firefox, Firefox Esr and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The Developer Tools feature suffers from a XUL injection vulnerability due to improper sanitization of the web page source code. In the worst case, this could allow arbitrary code execution when opening a malicious page with the style editor tool. This vulnerability affects Firefox ESR < 52.3 and Firefox < 55. | ||||
| CVE-2017-7465 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Cd | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| It was found that the JAXP implementation used in JBoss EAP 7.0 for XSLT processing is vulnerable to code injection. An attacker could use this flaw to cause remote code execution if they are able to provide XSLT content for parsing. Doing a transform in JAXP requires the use of a 'javax.xml.transform.TransformerFactory'. If the FEATURE_SECURE_PROCESSING feature is set to 'true', it mitigates this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3967 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Network Security Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Target influence via framing vulnerability in the web interface in McAfee Network Security Management (NSM) before 8.2.7.42.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via application pages inability to break out of 3rd party HTML frames. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3907 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Mcafee Threat Intelligence Exchange | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Code Injection vulnerability in the ePolicy Orchestrator (ePO) extension in McAfee Threat Intelligence Exchange (TIE) Server 2.1.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary HTML code to be reflected in the response web page via unspecified vector. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1789 | 1 Ibm | 1 Tivoli Monitoring | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| IBM Tivoli Monitoring V6 6.2.3 and 6.3.0 could allow an unauthenticated user to remotely execute code through unspecified methods. IBM X-Force ID: 137034. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1753 | 1 Ibm | 6 Rational Doors Next Generation, Rational Engineering Lifecycle Manager, Rational Quality Manager and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Multiple IBM Rational products are vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 135655. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1721 | 1 Ibm | 1 Qradar Security Information And Event Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| IBM Security QRadar SIEM 7.2 and 7.3 could allow an unauthenticated user to execute code remotely with lower level privileges under unusual circumstances. IBM X-Force ID: 134810. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1329 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 126231. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1248 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 124628. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1242 | 1 Ibm | 2 Rational Collaborative Lifecycle Management, Rational Quality Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| IBM Quality Manager (RQM) 5.0.x and 6.0 through 6.0.5 are vulnerable to HTML injection. A remote attacker could inject malicious HTML code, which when viewed, would be executed in the victim's Web browser within the security context of the hosting site. IBM X-Force ID: 124524. | ||||
| CVE-2017-18924 | 1 Oauth2-server Project | 1 Oauth2-server | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| oauth2-server (aka node-oauth2-server) through 3.1.1 implements OAuth 2.0 without PKCE. It does not prevent authorization code injection. This is similar to CVE-2020-7692. NOTE: the vendor states 'As RFC7636 is an extension, I think the claim in the Readme of "RFC 6749 compliant" is valid and not misleading and I also therefore wouldn't describe this as a "vulnerability" with the library per se. | ||||
| CVE-2017-18468 | 1 Cpanel | 1 Cpanel | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| cPanel before 62.0.17 allows demo accounts to execute code via the Htaccess::setphppreference API (SEC-232). | ||||
| CVE-2017-18356 | 1 Woocommerce | 1 Woocommerce | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Automattic WooCommerce plugin before 3.2.4 for WordPress, an attack is possible after gaining access to the target site with a user account that has at least Shop manager privileges. The attacker then constructs a specifically crafted string that will turn into a PHP object injection involving the includes/shortcodes/class-wc-shortcode-products.php WC_Shortcode_Products::get_products() use of cached queries within shortcodes. | ||||