Search

Search Results (385618 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-73270 1 Erlang 2 Erlang\/otp, Otp 2026-09-01 N/A
Improper Handling of Case Sensitivity vulnerability in Erlang/OTP inets httpd allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to read files inside a mod_auth protected directory by requesting them with different casing, on deployments whose filesystem is case-insensitive. mod_auth:secret_path/3 decides whether a resolved filesystem path lies inside a protected directory block by running the configured directory path through re:run/3 without the caseless option. A request for /secret/file against a directory configured as /Secret therefore does not match, so the request is treated as unprotected and no authentication challenge is issued, while the filesystem resolves the differently cased path to the same file and mod_get serves it. Deployments on case-sensitive filesystems are unaffected, because there the filesystem itself rejects the mismatched casing. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.
CVE-2026-73276 1 Erlang 2 Erlang/otp, Erlang\/otp 2026-09-01 N/A
Gracefulness code ignored cases that should be rejected, resulting in possible HTTP Request Smuggling opportunities. This issue affects OTP from OTP 22.2 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 7.1.2 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2.
CVE-2026-82732 1 Ash-project 1 Ash Typescript 2026-09-01 N/A
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows a remote attacker to submit argument values outside a declared allowlist or bound on typed-controller routes. AshTypescript.TypedController.RequestHandler in lib/ash_typescript/typed_controller/request_handler.ex calls Ash.Type.cast_input/3 and treats an {:ok, cast} result as fully validated. In Ash these are separate steps: cast_input/3 only coerces the term, while every constraint declared on the argument is applied by Ash.Type.apply_constraints/3, which this path never calls. Constraints such as one_of, max_length, min and max, and match are therefore inert, so a value outside a declared allowlist is accepted and passed to the route handler. Codegen renders the same constraints into the generated TypeScript types, so an allowlist appears enforced to a TypeScript caller while any other HTTP client ignores it. Empty-string to nil normalization also lives in apply_constraints, so the allow_nil?: false check accepts "" for a required argument. Where a constraint gates a role, a status, or a sort direction, this becomes a privilege or state-machine bypass. This issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.15.0 before 0.18.0.
CVE-2026-82733 1 Ash-project 1 Ash Typescript 2026-09-01 N/A
Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthenticated attacker to read internal application data from an HTTP 500 response body. When a typed-controller route handler returns anything other than a %Plug.Conn{}, dispatch/3 in lib/ash_typescript/typed_controller/request_handler.ex passes the value to unexpected_return/2, which interpolates inspect(value, limit: 50) directly into the response message. The limit option bounds elements per collection rather than the term as a whole, so a handler falling through with a term such as {:error, %User{}} or a changeset serialises its full field set, including hashed passwords, tokens, and tenant identifiers, into the JSON error returned to the caller. This contradicts the module's own posture elsewhere: the rescue clause gates Exception.message/1 behind AshTypescript.typed_controller_show_raised_errors?/0 and otherwise returns a generic message, while this path is ungated and always echoes. This issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.15.0 before 0.18.0.
CVE-2026-82734 1 Ash-project 1 Ash 2026-09-01 N/A
Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an attacker to submit a non-finite decimal value that bypasses numeric bounds constraints or fails later operations on the value. Ash.Type.Decimal cast input through Ecto's decimal cast in cast_input/2 and cast_stored/2 (lib/ash/type/decimal.ex) without checking that the resulting value is finite. Elixir's Decimal represents Infinity and NaN as valid structs, so a value such as "Infinity" or "NaN" passed casting and was persisted. Because NaN compares as false against every bound, min and max constraints do not reject it, and the stored special value later raises when used in Decimal arithmetic or is refused by the data layer, failing subsequent requests. The fix rejects any non-finite Decimal during casting. This issue affects ash: from 1.28.0 before 3.32.2.
CVE-2026-74837 1 Ash-project 1 Ash Typescript 2026-09-01 N/A
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in ash-project ash_typescript allows an unauthenticated attacker to exhaust the BEAM atom table and abort the node via client-supplied RPC field names. AshTypescript.FieldFormatter.convert_to_field_atom/2 in lib/ash_typescript/field_formatter.ex converts a client-supplied field name to an atom with String.to_atom/1 when no matching atom already exists. It delegates first to parse_input_field/2, which resolves the name with String.to_existing_atom/1 and falls back to returning the plain string; convert_to_field_atom/2 then mints an atom from that string rather than treating the name as unknown. RPC field selection reaches it for every requested field name through AshTypescript.Rpc.FieldProcessing.FieldSelector, which resolves each name before checking that the field exists, with no allowlist, length bound, or rate limit. Atoms are never garbage collected, so each distinct name mints a permanent one and the VM aborts once the atom table limit is reached. A field name over 255 characters additionally raises an uncaught SystemLimitError. This issue affects ash_typescript: from 0.1.0 before 0.18.0.
CVE-2026-74994 1 Erlang 3 Erlang/otp, Erlang\/otp, Otp 2026-09-01 N/A
The mod_auth module in OTP's inets httpd server, when configured with dets or mnesia authentication backends and multiple directory configuration blocks, collapses all directory blocks into a single shared user/group namespace. A user added to one protected directory is accepted as valid for all other protected directories on the same server instance. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to inets from 5.10 before 9.3.2.7, from 9.4 before 9.6.2.3, and from 9.7 before 9.7.2. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to inets before 5.10, is affected is unknown.
CVE-2026-75538 1 Erlang 3 Erlang/otp, Erlang\/otp, Otp 2026-09-01 N/A
An attacker that connects to an open Erlang TCP port that uses the inet driver with {packet,4} mode can use a signed overflow in an incorrect packet length calculation to overflow the receive buffer into the VM allocator area and beyond up to about 2 GB. This would easily trash the allocated block's allocator metadata footer, and the next block, if any, and most likely cause the BEAM VM to crash. Utilizing this with precision enough to achieve Remote Code Execution would be extremely unfeasible. This issue affects OTP from OTP 17.0 before OTP 27.3.4.17, from OTP 28.0 before OTP 28.5.0.6, and from OTP 29.0 before OTP 29.0.6, corresponding to erts from 6.0 before 15.2.7.13, from 16.0 before 16.4.0.6, and from 17.0 before 17.0.6. Whether OTP before OTP 17.0, corresponding to erts before 6.0, is affected is unknown.
CVE-2026-79686 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to bypass access restrictions and gain escalated privileges.
CVE-2026-79684 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to bypass access restrictions and gain escalated privileges.
CVE-2026-58575 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Dell PowerStore contains an Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability. An authenticated attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to escalate privileges to Administrator.
CVE-2026-58572 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Dell PowerStore contains a Code Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.
CVE-2026-58571 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Dell PowerStore contains an OS Command Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
CVE-2026-58569 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Dell PowerStore contains an Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges..
CVE-2026-79683 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Dell PowerStore contains a Protection Mechanism Failure vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to write attacker-controlled content to arbitrary filesystem paths.
CVE-2026-79685 1 Dell 12 Powerstore 1000t, Powerstore 1200t, Powerstore 3000t and 9 more 2026-09-01 6.5 Medium
Dell PowerStore contains an Argument Injection vulnerability. An authenticated user with limited privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability to gain unauthorized access to sensitive sensitive system information.
CVE-2026-18780 2026-09-01 7.1 High
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16.
CVE-2026-18630 2026-09-01 8.8 High
Improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command ('SQL injection') vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16.
CVE-2026-18771 2026-09-01 7.5 High
Missing authentication for critical function vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Authentication Bypass. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V4 before V.16.
CVE-2026-18931 2026-09-01 9.1 Critical
Use of Hard-coded Credentials vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16.