Total
6606 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-29794 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| The frame scheduling module has a Use After Free (UAF) vulnerability.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability will affect data integrity, availability, and confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29692 | 1 Unicorn-engine | 1 Unicorn Engine | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Unicorn Engine v1.0.3 was discovered to contain a use-after-free vulnerability via the hook function. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29582 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel before 5.17.3, fs/io_uring.c has a use-after-free due to a race condition in io_uring timeouts. This can be triggered by a local user who has no access to any user namespace; however, the race condition perhaps can only be exploited infrequently. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29522 | 1 Fujielectric | 2 V-server, V-sft | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free vulnerability exists in the simulator module contained in the graphic editor 'V-SFT' versions prior to v6.1.6.0, which may allow an attacker to obtain information and/or execute arbitrary code by having a user to open a specially crafted image file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-29156 | 2 Linux, Netapp | 17 Linux Kernel, H300e, H300e Firmware and 14 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| drivers/infiniband/ulp/rtrs/rtrs-clt.c in the Linux kernel before 5.16.12 has a double free related to rtrs_clt_dev_release. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28893 | 4 Debian, Linux, Netapp and 1 more | 25 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, H300e and 22 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| The SUNRPC subsystem in the Linux kernel through 5.17.2 can call xs_xprt_free before ensuring that sockets are in the intended state. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28838 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Acrobat Acrobat Pro DC version 22.001.2011x (and earlier), 20.005.3033x (and earlier) and 17.012.3022x (and earlier) are affected by a use-after-free vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28837 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| Acrobat Pro DC version 22.001.2011x (and earlier), 20.005.3033x (and earlier) and 17.012.3022x (and earlier) are affected by a use-after-free vulnerability that could lead to disclosure of sensitive memory. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass mitigations such as ASLR. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28796 | 4 Fedoraproject, Linux, Netapp and 1 more | 24 Fedora, Linux Kernel, Active Iq Unified Manager and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.0 High |
| jbd2_journal_wait_updates in fs/jbd2/transaction.c in the Linux kernel before 5.17.1 has a use-after-free caused by a transaction_t race condition. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28683 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the deletePages method. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16828. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28680 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 2 Pdf Editor, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16821. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28679 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16861. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28678 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Doc objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16805. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28677 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16663. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28676 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Doc objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16643. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28675 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16642. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28674 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16644. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28673 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Doc objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16641. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28672 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Doc objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16640. | ||||
| CVE-2022-28671 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PDF Reader 11.2.1.53537. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Doc objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-16639. | ||||