| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ajax/UpdateCheck.php in Vanilla 1.1.4 and earlier has unknown impact and remote attack vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the file manager in the VZPP web interface for Parallels Virtuozzo 365.6.swsoft (build 4.0.0-365.6.swsoft) and 25.4.swsoft (build 3.0.0-25.4.swsoft) allows remote attackers to create and delete arbitrary files as the administrator via a link or IMG tag to (1) create-file and (2) list-control in vz/cp/vzdir/infrman/envs/files/; or modify system configuration via the path parameter to vz/cp/vzdir/infrman/envs/files/index. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office 6, Cybozu Dezie before 6.0(1.0), and Cybozu Garoon 2.0.0 through 2.1.3 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| The web interface on the Axesstel MV 410R redirects users back to the referring page after execution of some CGI scripts, which makes it easier for remote attackers to avoid detection of cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks, as demonstrated by a redirect from the cgi-bin/wireless.cgi script. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Campus Virtual-LMS allow (1) remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that terminate a session via login/logout.php, and might allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of certain users via a (2) ADD or (3) DELETE action to enrolments/step2.php. |
| Ruby on Rails 2.1 before 2.1.3 and 2.2.x before 2.2.2 does not verify tokens for requests with certain content types, which allows remote attackers to bypass cross-site request forgery (CSRF) protection for requests to applications that rely on this protection, as demonstrated using text/plain. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in page 34 in MODx CMS 0.9.6.1 and 0.9.6.1p1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of other users for requests that modify passwords via manager/index.php. NOTE: due to the lack of details, it is not clear whether this is related to CVE-2008-5941. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in WS-Proxy in Eye-Fi 1.1.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that modify configuration via a SOAPAction parameter of (1) urn:SetOptions for autostart, (2) urn:SetDesktopSync for file upload, or (3) urn:SetFolderConfig for file download location or modification of authentication credentials; and (4) urn:AddNetwork for adding an arbitrary Service Set Identifier (SSID) to hijack the image upload. |
| The Events Manager – Calendar, Bookings, Tickets, and more! plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.4.7.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several actions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify booking statuses via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| eladmin v2.7 and before is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) which allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the DatabaseController.java component. |
| The Smart Forms WordPress plugin before 2.6.87 does not have authorisation in various AJAX actions, which could allow users with a role as low as subscriber to call them and perform unauthorised actions such as deleting entries. The plugin also lacks CSRF checks in some places which could allow attackers to make logged in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks such as deleting entries. |
| The Smart Forms WordPress plugin before 2.6.94 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged-in users perform unwanted actions via CSRF attacks, such as editing entries, and we consider it a medium risk. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wprio Table Block by RioVizual allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Table Block by RioVizual: from n/a through 2.1.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Quý Lê 91 Administrator Z allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Administrator Z: from n/a through 2025.03.04. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Saiful Islam UltraAddons Elementor Lite allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects UltraAddons Elementor Lite: from n/a through 2.0.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in BeRocket Sequential Order Numbers for WooCommerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Sequential Order Numbers for WooCommerce: from n/a through 3.6.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Kuppuraj Advanced All in One Admin Search by WP Spotlight allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced All in One Admin Search by WP Spotlight: from n/a through 1.1.1. |
| The WPFront User Role Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the whitelist_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the default role option that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This is only exploitable on multisite instances. |
| Rumpus - FTP server version 9.0.7.1 Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) – vulnerability may allow unauthorized action on behalf of authenticated users. |
| Rumpus - FTP server Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) – Privilege escalation vulnerability that may allow privilege escalation. |
