Total
1836 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-27817 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Kafka, Amq Streams | 2025-07-11 | 7.5 High |
| A possible arbitrary file read and SSRF vulnerability has been identified in Apache Kafka Client. Apache Kafka Clients accept configuration data for setting the SASL/OAUTHBEARER connection with the brokers, including "sasl.oauthbearer.token.endpoint.url" and "sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url". Apache Kafka allows clients to read an arbitrary file and return the content in the error log, or sending requests to an unintended location. In applications where Apache Kafka Clients configurations can be specified by an untrusted party, attackers may use the "sasl.oauthbearer.token.endpoint.url" and "sasl.oauthbearer.jwks.endpoint.url" configuratin to read arbitrary contents of the disk and environment variables or make requests to an unintended location. In particular, this flaw may be used in Apache Kafka Connect to escalate from REST API access to filesystem/environment/URL access, which may be undesirable in certain environments, including SaaS products. Since Apache Kafka 3.9.1/4.0.0, we have added a system property ("-Dorg.apache.kafka.sasl.oauthbearer.allowed.urls") to set the allowed urls in SASL JAAS configuration. In 3.9.1, it accepts all urls by default for backward compatibility. However in 4.0.0 and newer, the default value is empty list and users have to set the allowed urls explicitly. | ||||
| CVE-2025-42965 | 2025-07-11 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| SAP CMC Promotion Management allows an authenticated attacker to enumerate internal network systems by submitting crafted requests during job source configuration. By analysing response times for various IP addresses and ports, the attacker can infer valid network endpoints. Successful exploitation may lead to information disclosure. This vulnerability does not impact the integrity or availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22952 | 1 Usememos | 1 Memos | 2025-07-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| elestio memos v0.23.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) due to insufficient validation of user-supplied URLs, which can be exploited to perform SSRF attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2023-24954 | 1 Microsoft | 14 Sharepoint Enterprise Server, Sharepoint Server, Windows 10 1507 and 11 more | 2025-07-10 | 6.5 Medium |
| Microsoft SharePoint Server Information Disclosure Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2024-38109 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Health Bot | 2025-07-10 | 9.1 Critical |
| An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-38206 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Copilot Studio | 2025-07-10 | 8.5 High |
| An authenticated attacker can bypass Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection in Microsoft Copilot Studio to leak sensitive information over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2023-37230 | 1 Loftware | 1 Spectrum | 2025-07-10 | 8.8 High |
| Loftware Spectrum (testDeviceConnection) before 5.1 allows SSRF. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1970 | 1 Webtoffee | 1 Import Export Wordpress Users | 2025-07-09 | 7.6 High |
| The Export and Import Users and Customers plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.2 via the validate_file() function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6729 | 1 Qazomardok | 1 Paymaster For Woocommerce | 2025-07-09 | 6.4 Medium |
| The PayMaster for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.4.31 via the 'wp_ajax_paym_status' AJAX action This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1912 | 1 Webtoffee | 1 Product Import Export For Woocommerce | 2025-07-09 | 7.6 High |
| The Product Import Export for WooCommerce – Import Export Product CSV Suite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.0 via the validate_file() Function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26990 | 1 Royal-elementor-addons | 1 Royal Elementor Addons | 2025-07-08 | 4.4 Medium |
| Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in WP Royal Royal Elementor Addons allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Royal Elementor Addons: from n/a through 1.7.1006. | ||||
| CVE-2025-21384 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Health Bot | 2025-07-08 | 8.3 High |
| An authenticated attacker can exploit an Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Microsoft Azure Health Bot to elevate privileges over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12766 | 1 Lollms | 1 Lollms Web Ui | 2025-07-08 | N/A |
| parisneo/lollms-webui version V13 (feather) suffers from a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the `POST /api/proxy` REST API. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability to abuse the victim server's credentials to access unauthorized web resources by specifying the JSON parameter `{"url":"http://steal.target"}`. Existing security mechanisms such as `forbid_remote_access(lollmsElfServer)`, `lollmsElfServer.config.headless_server_mode`, and `check_access(lollmsElfServer, request.client_id)` do not protect against this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53473 | 2025-07-08 | N/A | ||
| Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists n multiple versions of Nimesa Backup and Recovery, If this vulnerability is exploited, unintended requests may be sent to internal servers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-48232 | 1 Mipjz Project | 1 Mipjz | 2025-07-07 | 4.9 Medium |
| An issue was found in mipjz 5.0.5. In the mipPost method of \app\setting\controller\ApiAdminTool.php, the value of the postAddress parameter is not processed and is directly passed into curl_exec execution and output, resulting in a Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that can read server files. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29030 | 1 Usememos | 1 Memos | 2025-07-07 | 5.8 Medium |
| memos is a privacy-first, lightweight note-taking service. In memos 0.13.2, an SSRF vulnerability exists at the /api/resource that allows authenticated users to enumerate the internal network. Version 0.22.0 of memos removes the vulnerable file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29028 | 1 Usememos | 1 Memos | 2025-07-07 | 5.8 Medium |
| memos is a privacy-first, lightweight note-taking service. In memos 0.13.2, an SSRF vulnerability exists at the /o/get/httpmeta that allows unauthenticated users to enumerate the internal network and receive limited html values in json form. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.16.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2940 | 1 Wpmanageninja | 1 Ninja Tables | 2025-07-07 | 7.2 High |
| The Ninja Tables – Easy Data Table Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.18 via the args[url] parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53018 | 1 Lycheeorg | 1 Lychee | 2025-07-06 | 3 Low |
| Lychee is a free, open-source photo-management tool. Prior to version 6.6.13, a critical Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the `/api/v2/Photo::fromUrl` endpoint. This flaw lets an attacker instruct the application’s backend to make HTTP requests to any URL they choose. Consequently, internal network resources—such as localhost services or cloud-provider metadata endpoints—become reachable. The endpoint takes a URL from the user and calls it server-side via fopen() without any safeguards. There is no IP address validation, nor are there any allow-list, timeout, or size restrictions. Because of this, attackers can point the application at internal targets. Using this flaw, an attacker can perform internal port scans or retrieve sensitive cloud metadata. Version 6.6.13 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-52491 | 1 Akamai | 1 Cloudtest | 2025-07-06 | 5.8 Medium |
| Akamai CloudTest before 60 2025.06.09 (12989) allows SSRF. | ||||