| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u65 and 7u45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Deployment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5898 and CVE-2014-0403. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Spatial component in Oracle Database Server 11.1.0.7, 11.2.0.3, 11.2.0.4, and 12.1.0.1 allows local users to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise PeopleTools component in Oracle PeopleSoft Products 8.52 and 8.53 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Updates Environment Mgmt, a different vulnerability than CVE-2014-0395. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u65 and 7u45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Deployment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5898 and CVE-2014-0375. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u65 and 7u45 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Deployment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5889, CVE-2013-5902, CVE-2014-0415, CVE-2014-0418, and CVE-2014-0424. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop (SGD) component in Oracle Virtualization SGD before 4.63 with December 2013 PSU, 4.71, 5.0 with December 2013 PSU, and 5.10 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Administration Console and Workspace Web Applications. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle WebCenter Content component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 10.1.3.5.1, 11.1.1.6.0, and 11.1.1.7.0 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Content Server. NOTE: the previous information is from the October 2013 CPU. Oracle has not commented on claims from a third party that the issue is related to "iDoc script injection" in the (1) cs and (2) urm components, which allows attackers to read "sensitive" files, as demonstrated by obtaining the "AES encryption key and encrypted credentials" of the weblogic user. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Agile Product Lifecycle Management for Process component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 6.0, 6.1, and 6.1.1 allows remote attackers to affect integrity via unknown vectors related to Installation. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle AutoVue Electro-Mechanical Professional component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 20.1.1 allows remote authenticated users to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Web General, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-5868 and CVE-2013-5871. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier, and 6 Update 35 and earlier, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Deployment, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-1533. |
| Mozilla Firefox before 27.0 and SeaMonkey before 2.24 allow remote attackers to bypass the Same Origin Policy and obtain sensitive information by using an IFRAME element in conjunction with certain timing measurements involving the document.caretPositionFromPoint and document.elementFromPoint functions. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle Agile PLM for Process component in Oracle Supply Chain Products Suite 5.2.2 and 6.1.0.0 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to User Group Management. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Oracle HTTP Server component in Oracle Fusion Middleware 11.1.1.2 and 11.1.1.3 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality and integrity via unknown vectors related to Apache Plugin. |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 17 and earlier and JavaFX 2.2.7 and earlier allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors related to JavaFX, as demonstrated by VUPEN during a Pwn2Own competition at CanSecWest 2013. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the JavaFX component in Oracle Java SE JavaFX 2.2.4 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors, a different vulnerability than other CVEs listed in the February 2013 CPU. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 7u40 and earlier and JavaFX 2.2.40 and earlier allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in the Siebel Core - Server Infrastructure component in Oracle Siebel CRM 8.1.1 and 8.2.2 allows remote attackers to affect availability via vectors related to SISNAPI & Network Infrastructure. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 6u65 and 7u45, Java SE Embedded 7u45, and OpenJDK 7 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via unknown vectors related to Security. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2014 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that the Security component does not properly handle null XML namespace (xmlns) attributes during XML document canonicalization, which allows attackers to escape the sandbox. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u55, 6u65, and 7u45, and Java SE Embedded 7u45, allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality via unknown vectors related to Networking. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2014 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that the issue is related to incorrect permission checks when listening on a socket, which allows attackers to escape the sandbox. |
| Unspecified vulnerability in Oracle Java SE 5.0u55, 6u65, and 7u45; Java SE Embedded 7u45; and OpenJDK 7 allows remote attackers to affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability via vectors related to JNDI. NOTE: the previous information is from the January 2014 CPU. Oracle has not commented on third-party claims that the issue is related to missing package access checks in the Naming / JNDI component, which allows attackers to escape the sandbox. |
