| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Jenkins before 1.638 and LTS before 1.625.2 uses a publicly accessible salt to generate CSRF protection tokens, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism via a brute force attack. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Test/WorkArea/DmsMenu/menuActions/MenuActions.aspx in Ektron Content Management System (CMS) before 9.10 SP1 (Build 9.1.0.184.1.120) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of content administrators for requests that delete content via a delete action. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Featured Comments plugin 1.2.1 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change the (1) buried or (2) featured status of a comment via a request to wp-admin/admin-ajax.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Shopizer 1.1.5 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) modify customer settings or hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change (2) customer passwords, (3) shop configuration, or (4) product details, as demonstrated by (5) modify a product's price via a crafted request to central/catalog/saveproduct.action or (6) creating a product review via a crafted request to shop/product/createReview.action. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Menubook plugin before 0.9.3 for baserCMS allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Quick Page/Post Redirect plugin before 5.0.5 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the quickppr_redirects[request][] parameter in the redirect-updates page to wp-admin/admin.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in doorkeeper before 1.4.1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims for requests that read a user OAuth authorization code via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Hitachi Tuning Manager before 7.6.1-06 and 8.x before 8.0.0-04 and JP1/Performance Management - Manager Web Option 07-00 through 07-54 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) 7.1 through 7.2.2 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.x before 2.3.20 uses predictable <s:token/> values, which allows remote attackers to bypass the CSRF protection mechanism. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Disqus Comment System plugin 2.77 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) activate or (2) deactivate the plugin via the active parameter to wp-admin/edit-comments.php, (3) import comments via an import_comments action, or (4) export comments via an export_comments action to wp-admin/index.php. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in ZPanel 10.0.1 and earlier allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create new FTP users via a CreateFTP action in the ftp_management module to the default URI, (2) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the inFullname parameter in an UpdateAccountSettings action in the my_account module to zpanel/, or (3) conduct SQL injection attacks via the inEmailAddress parameter in an UpdateClient action in the manage_clients module to the default URI. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Contact Form Generator plugin 2.0.1 and earlier for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) create a field, (2) update a field, (3) delete a field, (4) create a form, (5) update a form, (6) delete a form, (7) create a template, (8) update a template, (9) delete a template, or (10) conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted request to the cfg_forms page in wp-admin/admin.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on eWON devices with firmware through 10.1s0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that trigger firmware upload, removal of configuration data, or a reboot. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the JW Player plugin before 2.1.4 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that remove players via a delete action to wp-admin/admin.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HP System Management Homepage (SMH) before 7.4 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the WordPress File Upload plugin (wp-file-upload) before 2.4.2 for WordPress allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that change plugin settings via unspecified vectors. NOTE: some of these details are obtained from third party information. |
| The dashbuilder in Red Hat JBoss BPM Suite 6.3.2 does not properly handle CSRF tokens generated during an active session and includes them in query strings, which makes easier for remote attackers to (1) bypass CSRF protection mechanisms or (2) conduct cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by obtaining an old token. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tollgrade SmartGrid LightHouse Sensor Management System (SMS) Software EMS before 5.1, and 4.1.0 Build 16, allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Admin Web UI in IBM Lotus Protector for Mail Security 2.8.x before 2.8.1-22905 allows remote authenticated users to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |