| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Tenda TX3 US_TX3V1.0br_V16.03.13.11 is vulnerable to stack overflow via compare_parentcontrol_time. |
| XXL-JOB 2.2.0 has a Command execution vulnerability in background tasks. NOTE: this is disputed because the issues/4929 report is about an intended and supported use case (running arbitrary Bash scripts on behalf of users). |
| TOTOLINK A860R V4.1.2cu.5182_B20201027 was discovered to contain a command injection via the component /cgi-bin/downloadFile.cgi. |
| readelf in ToaruOS 2.0.1 has a global overflow allowing RCE when parsing a crafted ELF file. |
| In GraphicsMagick, a heap buffer overflow was found when parsing MIFF. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability was found on Western Digital My Cloud Home, My Cloud Home Duo, and SanDisk ibi that could allow an attacker accessing the system locally to read information from /etc/version file. This vulnerability can only be exploited by chaining it with another issue. If an attacker is able to carry out a remote code execution attack, they can gain access to the vulnerable file, due to the presence of insecure functions in code. User interaction is required for exploitation. Exploiting the vulnerability could result in exposure of information, ability to modify files, memory access errors, or system crashes. |
|
Dell vApp Manager, versions prior to 9.2.4.x contain a command injection vulnerability. A remote malicious user with high privileges could potentially exploit this vulnerability leading to the execution of arbitrary OS commands on the affected system.
|
| In Carlo Gavazzi UWP3.0 in multiple versions and CPY Car Park Server in Version 2.8.3 a remote, unauthenticated attacker could utilize an improper input validation on an API-submitted parameter to execute arbitrary OS commands. |
| Softnext Mail SQR Expert is an email management platform, it has insufficient filtering for a special character within a spcific function. A remote attacker authenticated as a localhost can exploit this vulnerability to perform command injection attacks, to execute arbitrary system command, manipulate system or disrupt service. |
| A buffer overflow in the component nfc_device_load_mifare_ul_data of Flipper Devices Inc., Flipper Zero before v0.65.2 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted NFC file. |
| Memory corruption in Audio during playback with speaker protection. |
| D-Link DIR-845L router v1.01KRb03 and before is vulnerable to Command injection via the hnap_main()func. |
| D-Link DIR-822+ V1.0.5 was found to contain a command injection in ChgSambaUserSettings function of prog.cgi, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
efi: runtime: Fix potential overflow of soft-reserved region size
md_size will have been narrowed if we have >= 4GB worth of pages in a
soft-reserved region. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
btrfs: prevent copying too big compressed lzo segment
Compressed length can be corrupted to be a lot larger than memory
we have allocated for buffer.
This will cause memcpy in copy_compressed_segment to write outside
of allocated memory.
This mostly results in stuck read syscall but sometimes when using
btrfs send can get #GP
kernel: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x841551d5c1000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
kernel: CPU: 17 PID: 264 Comm: kworker/u256:7 Tainted: P OE 5.17.0-rc2-1 #12
kernel: Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_work_helper [btrfs]
kernel: RIP: 0010:lzo_decompress_bio (./include/linux/fortify-string.h:225 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:322 fs/btrfs/lzo.c:394) btrfs
Code starting with the faulting instruction
===========================================
0:* 48 8b 06 mov (%rsi),%rax <-- trapping instruction
3: 48 8d 79 08 lea 0x8(%rcx),%rdi
7: 48 83 e7 f8 and $0xfffffffffffffff8,%rdi
b: 48 89 01 mov %rax,(%rcx)
e: 44 89 f0 mov %r14d,%eax
11: 48 8b 54 06 f8 mov -0x8(%rsi,%rax,1),%rdx
kernel: RSP: 0018:ffffb110812efd50 EFLAGS: 00010212
kernel: RAX: 0000000000001000 RBX: 000000009ca264c8 RCX: ffff98996e6d8ff8
kernel: RDX: 0000000000000064 RSI: 000841551d5c1000 RDI: ffffffff9500435d
kernel: RBP: ffff989a3be856c0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: ffff98996e6d8000
kernel: R13: 0000000000000008 R14: 0000000000001000 R15: 000841551d5c1000
kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff98a09d640000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
kernel: CR2: 00001e9f984d9ea8 CR3: 000000014971a000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
kernel: Call Trace:
kernel: <TASK>
kernel: end_compressed_bio_read (fs/btrfs/compression.c:104 fs/btrfs/compression.c:1363 fs/btrfs/compression.c:323) btrfs
kernel: end_workqueue_fn (fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1923) btrfs
kernel: btrfs_work_helper (fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:326) btrfs
kernel: process_one_work (./arch/x86/include/asm/jump_label.h:27 ./include/linux/jump_label.h:212 ./include/trace/events/workqueue.h:108 kernel/workqueue.c:2312)
kernel: worker_thread (./include/linux/list.h:292 kernel/workqueue.c:2455)
kernel: ? process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2397)
kernel: kthread (kernel/kthread.c:377)
kernel: ? kthread_complete_and_exit (kernel/kthread.c:332)
kernel: ret_from_fork (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:301)
kernel: </TASK> |
| Networking OS10, versions 10.5.1.x, 10.5.2.x, and 10.5.3.x contain a vulnerability that could allow an attacker to cause a system crash by running particular security scans. |
| An issue was discovered in Xpdf 4.04. There is a crash in XRef::fetch(int, int, Object*, int) in xpdf/XRef.cc, a different vulnerability than CVE-2018-16369 and CVE-2019-16088. |
| An issue was discovered in Xpdf 4.04. There is a crash in gfseek(_IO_FILE*, long, int) in goo/gfile.cc. |
| In wolfSSL before 5.5.1, malicious clients can cause a buffer overflow during a TLS 1.3 handshake. This occurs when an attacker supposedly resumes a previous TLS session. During the resumption Client Hello a Hello Retry Request must be triggered. Both Client Hellos are required to contain a list of duplicate cipher suites to trigger the buffer overflow. In total, two Client Hellos have to be sent: one in the resumed session, and a second one as a response to a Hello Retry Request message. |
| Due to lack of proper memory management, when a victim opens a manipulated Jupiter Tesselation (.jt, JTReader.x3d) file received from untrusted sources in SAP 3D Visual Enterprise Viewer - version 9, it is possible that a Remote Code Execution can be triggered when payload forces a stack-based overflow or a re-use of dangling pointer which refers to overwritten space in memory.
|
