| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Credova Financial Credova_Financial allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Credova_Financial: from n/a through 2.5.0. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Igor Benic Simple Giveaways allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Simple Giveaways: from n/a through 2.48.2. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in themarketer2023 theMarketer allows Stored XSS. This issue affects theMarketer: from n/a through 1.4.7. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Ability, Inc Web Accessibility with Max Access allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Web Accessibility with Max Access: from n/a through 2.0.9. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in codemstory 워드프레스 결제 심플페이 allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects 워드프레스 결제 심플페이: from n/a through 5.2.11. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Smaily Smaily for WP allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Smaily for WP: from n/a through 3.1.6. |
| The AdminPad WordPress plugin before 2.2 does not have CSRF check when updating admin's note, allowing attackers to make a logged in admin update their notes via a CSRF attack |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Palscode Multi Currency For WooCommerce.This issue affects Multi Currency For WooCommerce: from n/a through 1.5.5.
|
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Michael Winkler teachPress.This issue affects teachPress: from n/a through 9.0.4.
|
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Blue Coral Chat Bubble – Floating Chat with Contact Chat Icons, Messages, Telegram, Email, SMS, Call me back.This issue affects Chat Bubble – Floating Chat with Contact Chat Icons, Messages, Telegram, Email, SMS, Call me back: from n/a through 2.3.
|
| The Altra Side Menu WordPress plugin through 2.0 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary menu via a CSRF attack |
| The Dyn Business Panel WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. |
| PwnDoc is a penetration test report generator. There is no CSRF protection in pwndoc, allowing attackers to send requests on a logged-in user's behalf. This includes GET and POST requests due to the missing SameSite= attribute on cookies and the ability to refresh cookies. Commit 14acb704891245bf1703ce6296d62112e85aa995 patches the issue. |
| The WP Projects Portfolio with Client Testimonials WordPress plugin through 3.0 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack. |
| The ENL Newsletter WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF checks in some places, which could allow attackers to make logged in admins delete arbitrary Campaigns via a CSRF attack |
| The ENL Newsletter WordPress plugin through 1.0.1 does not have CSRF check in some places, and is missing sanitisation as well as escaping, which could allow attackers to make logged in admin add Stored XSS payloads via a CSRF attack |
| The WooCommerce Customers Manager WordPress plugin before 29.8 does not have authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, allowing any authenticated users, such as subscriber, to call it and retrieve the list of customer email addresses along with their id, first name and last name |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in W3speedster W3SPEEDSTER.This issue affects W3SPEEDSTER: from n/a through 7.19.
|
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Nexus Dashboard and Cisco Nexus Dashboard hosted services could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected system.
This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. If the affected user has administrative privileges, these actions could include modifying the system configuration and creating new privileged accounts.
Note: There are internal security mechanisms in place that limit the scope of this exploit, reducing the Security Impact Rating of this vulnerability. |
| The AHAthat Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the aha_plugin_page() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete AHA pages via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
