| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Graphic Fonts allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. |
| A flaw was found in camel-infinispan. This vulnerability involves unsafe deserialization in the ProtoStream remote aggregation repository. A remote attacker with low privileges could exploit this by sending specially crafted data, leading to arbitrary code execution. This allows the attacker to gain full control over the affected system, impacting its confidentiality, integrity, and availability. |
| Weak Password Recovery Mechanism for Forgotten Password vulnerability in Ankaref Innovation and Technology Inc. LIBRID/LIBREF allows Password Recovery Exploitation.
This issue affects LIBRID/LIBREF: from 2.01.0.2183 before 18.9.26.2319. |
| The WP Yelp Review Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via Yelp Review Text (imported via wpyelp_download_source) in all versions up to, and including, 9.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The malicious payload originates from an anonymous Yelp reviewer on a public platform and requires no WordPress account; it is introduced into the database during the site administrator's ordinary use of the plugin's Download Reviews feature, making the effective attacker unauthenticated. |
| Not a vulnerability. Creating a serial queue that overwrites cups-files.conf requires membership in SystemGroups (lpadmin), which is an opt-in cupsd admin role granted by a superuser. No privilege boundary is crossed. |
| A flaw was found in libstdc++. An integer overflow can occur when processing large inputs to the aligned operator new in the C++ library. This vulnerability could lead to an undersized memory allocation, potentially causing memory corruption or application instability. |
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a high-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. |
| Kaneo versions 2.3.12 before 2.12.2 contain a missing authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated workspace members with viewer or member roles to delete and modify tasks beyond their assigned permissions by exploiting the bulk task endpoint that omits workspace permission checks. Attackers can send requests to the PATCH /api/task/bulk endpoint, which verifies only workspace membership without calling the role-based permission check enforced on all other task endpoints, to permanently delete all tasks or modify task status, priority, assignee, due date, and labels in a workspace. |
| source-map-js through 1.2.1 fails to validate the per-section offset line value in indexed source maps, allowing attackers to specify arbitrary numeric values. Attackers can supply extremely large offset line values that cause synchronous event loop blocking for extended periods, preventing the service from handling other requests. |
| automation-controller: InventorySource.source_vars lacks
prevent_search, enabling zero-privilege cross-tenant
extraction of inline inventory-plugin credentials via the
credential_types FieldLookupBackend count-oracle |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. The bulk job launch endpoint builds workflow job nodes from client
input using a serializer that leaves the node's job reference -- a field normally
set by the workflow task manager after it spawns a child job -- writable and does
not include it in the permission validation performed for the other node fields.
An authenticated user with permission to execute a single job template can submit
a bulk job launch whose node references the identifier of any unified job in any
organization, including jobs they cannot access. The node then exposes that job's
metadata, and cancelling the attacker's workflow cancels the referenced job
through the workflow cancellation cascade, without any per-job authorization
check. Repeated, this allows a low-privileged user to cancel running jobs,
project and inventory syncs, ad hoc commands, and system jobs across all
organizations, denying automation service platform-wide. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller.
The execute-permission check on a workflow job template node's unified job
template is skipped when the node's currently stored unified job template is
empty: the check inspects only the existing value, not the incoming one, and a
node can be created without a unified job template. An authenticated user who
holds admin permission on a single workflow job template can create an empty node
and then patch it to reference any job template, project, inventory source,
system job, or workflow on the platform -- including ones in other organizations
that they cannot otherwise read or launch. Running their own workflow then
executes the victim template with the victim's attached credentials, inventory
and project, resulting in cross-organization privilege escalation to arbitrary
automation execution. The patch response also discloses the victim template's
name and description. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-controller. A user
with the delegated Instance Group Admin role on a container group can set a free-form
pod specification override that is deep-merged, without filtering, into every job pod
launched on that group. The only hardening applied is forcing
automountServiceAccountToken to false, which does not remove an explicitly declared
projected serviceAccountToken volume or secret volume mounts. A non-superuser can
therefore cause the kubelet to mint a ServiceAccount token for the control-plane
automation-controller service account into the job container and mount arbitrary
secrets from the control-plane namespace, obtaining the control-plane service-account
identity on the Kubernetes API and cleartext control-plane secrets (including the
platform database password and Django SECRET_KEY), leading to full platform data
compromise. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. The GALAXY_TASK_ENV setting, whose values are added to the
environment of the ansible-galaxy commands run during project updates, is not
validated to exclude dynamic-linker and interpreter environment variables such
as LD_PRELOAD and PYTHONPATH, unlike the sibling AWX_TASK_ENV setting. A user
with the system administrator role can set these variables to point at a file
placed inside a project checkout on the shared projects volume, causing
arbitrary native or Python code to execute inside the project synchronization
execution environment on the control plane. This yields read and write access
to every organization's project content and to injected Galaxy server tokens,
resulting in a cross-tenant compromise of the automation content supply chain. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. The Thycotic Secret Server external credential plugin passes a
user-supplied server URL to its SDK without validating the scheme, host, or IP
range, and the plugin backend is executed synchronously within the automation
controller web process. Using the external credential test endpoint, a user who
holds only the use role on such a credential can override the stored server URL
with an arbitrary internal address, causing the control plane to issue requests
to internal services. Although the response is a generic error, response timing
reveals whether internal hosts and ports are reachable, enabling internal
network reconnaissance and a blind request-forgery primitive from the control
plane, and each request can hold a web worker, affecting availability. |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform's automation-
controller. Notification template password fields are encrypted with a key
derived from the secret key, the object primary key, and the field name, but not
the subfield name, and the API returns the full ciphertext of a password subfield
after the notification type is changed to one that does not define that subfield.
A user with administrative access to a single notification template, but without
any wider privilege, can switch the template type to reveal the stored
ciphertext, replant that ciphertext into a webhook password field pointing at a
server they control, and trigger a test notification. The controller decrypts the
replayed ciphertext to the original plaintext and sends it to the attacker's
server in an HTTP Basic authorization header, allowing recovery of Slack,
PagerDuty, Twilio, AWS SNS, and Grafana credentials the administrator was only
permitted to use, not read. |
| A flaw was found in bubblewrap. During sandbox setup, creating files or directories under the new root can follow a parent symlink onto the host via /oldroot, writing attacker-chosen paths outside the sandbox as the launching user. This happens before the sandboxed process starts. This issue is GHSA-pxhw-h44j-8pfx. It is fixed in bubblewrap 0.12.0. |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Access and security). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.26.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N). |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management product of Oracle Hyperion (component: Access and security). The supported version that is affected is 11.2.26.0.000. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Hyperion Data Relationship Management accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.6 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N). |
