Filtered by vendor Checkpoint
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Firewall-1
Subscriptions
Total
43 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-1999-0895 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Firewall-1 does not properly restrict access to LDAP attributes. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0116 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Firewall-1 does not properly filter script tags, which allows remote attackers to bypass the "Strip Script Tags" restriction by including an extra < in front of the SCRIPT tag. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0181 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Firewall-1 3.0 and 4.0 leaks packets with private IP address information, which could allow remote attackers to determine the real IP address of the host that is making the connection. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0582 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a stream of invalid commands (such as binary zeros) to the SMTP Security Server proxy. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0779 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Checkpoint Firewall-1 with the RSH/REXEC setting enabled allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions and connect to a RSH/REXEC client via malformed connection requests. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0809 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in Getkey in the protocol checker in the inter-module communication mechanism in Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2000-1201 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (high CPU) via a flood of packets to port 264. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0940 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in the GUI authentication code of Check Point VPN-1/FireWall-1 Management Server 4.0 and 4.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a long user name. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0757 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 4.0 and 4.1 before SP5 allows remote attackers to obtain the IP addresses of internal interfaces via certain SecuRemote requests to TCP ports 256 or 264, which leaks the IP addresses in a reply packet. | ||||
| CVE-2002-0428 | 1 Checkpoint | 3 Check Point Vpn, Firewall-1, Next Generation | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 SecuRemote/SecuClient 4.0 and 4.1 allows clients to bypass the "authentication timeout" by modifying the to_expire or expire values in the client's users.C configuration file. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0081 | 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more | 67 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 64 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| OpenSSL 0.9.6 before 0.9.6d does not properly handle unknown message types, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop), as demonstrated using the Codenomicon TLS Test Tool. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0112 | 24 4d, Apple, Avaya and 21 more | 65 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 62 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The SSL/TLS handshaking code in OpenSSL 0.9.7a, 0.9.7b, and 0.9.7c, when using Kerberos ciphersuites, does not properly check the length of Kerberos tickets during a handshake, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that causes an out-of-bounds read. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0079 | 23 4d, Apple, Avaya and 20 more | 67 Webstar, Mac Os X, Mac Os X Server and 64 more | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 High |
| The do_change_cipher_spec function in OpenSSL 0.9.6c to 0.9.6k, and 0.9.7a to 0.9.7c, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (crash) via a crafted SSL/TLS handshake that triggers a null dereference. | ||||
| CVE-2002-2405 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 4.1 and Next Generation (NG), with UserAuth configured to proxy HTTP traffic only, allows remote attackers to pass unauthorized HTTPS, FTP and possibly other traffic through the firewall. | ||||
| CVE-2006-3885 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in Check Point Firewall-1 R55W before HFA03 allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via an encoded .. (dot dot) in the URL on TCP port 18264. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0039 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple format string vulnerabilities in HTTP Application Intelligence (AI) component in Check Point Firewall-1 NG-AI R55 and R54, and Check Point Firewall-1 HTTP Security Server included with NG FP1, FP2, and FP3 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via HTTP requests that cause format string specifiers to be used in an error message, as demonstrated using the scheme of a URI. | ||||
| CVE-2000-1037 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point Firewall-1 session agent 3.0 through 4.1 generates different error messages for invalid user names versus invalid passwords, which allows remote attackers to determine valid usernames and guess a password via a brute force attack. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0675 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Check Point FireWall-1 can be subjected to a denial of service via UDP packets that are sent through VPN-1 to port 0 of a host. | ||||
| CVE-2001-1431 | 2 Checkpoint, Nokia | 3 Firewall-1, Vpn-1, Firewall Appliance | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Nokia Firewall Appliances running IPSO 3.3 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 3, IPSO 3.4 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 4, and IPSO 3.4 or IPSO 3.4.1 and VPN-1/FireWall-1 4.1 Service Pack 5, when SYN Defender is configured in Active Gateway mode, does not properly rewrite the third packet of a TCP three-way handshake to use the NAT IP address, which allows remote attackers to gain sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0770 | 1 Checkpoint | 1 Firewall-1 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Firewall-1 sets a long timeout for connections that begin with ACK or other packets except SYN, allowing an attacker to conduct a denial of service via a large number of connection attempts to unresponsive systems. | ||||